whether it's the official media or the social media, Pakistan is looked upon very favorably. The term "IronPak" was coined by Chinese netizens and then found its way into the official media. There are also a whole bunch of travel videos by ordinary Chinese tourists who are highly appreciative of...
It may be a stretch to blame Indian hypocrisy and mendacity on genetics but it is safe to say that at least Indian culture condones such behavior. "Incredible India" has managed to produce a so-called elite class made up almost entirely of cheats and liars.
I am only aware of one Global Times report on the issue. Whatever has happened or is happening hasn't become newsworthy in the Chinese media, at least not yet.
He mentioned Pakistan along with all the other central asian stans. If I have to go out on a limb and make a guess, he may be referring to elements in these lands covetly encouraging separatism in Xinjiang. This is mere conjecture, because the video clip is too short for me to determine with any...
I am actually not familiar with him. He did use the term "他妈的“,which is a pretty mild curse word similar to damn/darn in English. It's far less intense than "fucking". Depening on the context the term may even be used to refer to a friend. As for the broad Sino-Pakistan relations the Chinese...
To be honest very few Chines at the moment would agree with you on that. However Chinese R&D expenditure has seen and will continue to see double digit increase. If current trend continues China will overtake the US in R&D in about 5 years. This is projection and let's see if it pans out.
I hope your optimism is well founded. Given the fact that Hong Kong courts are presided over by bonafide foreign colonial judges I am not confident at all. He will walk scot-free.
There are all sorts of false flag trolls. I, for one, very much doubt he's an Israeli. It's extremely unusual for an Israeli to be so obsessed with China. Don't judge pdf posters by the flags they choose to display.
Beijingwalker posted the same videos a day ago. There was a pretty active discussion going on, running 5-6 pages. That thread vanished into air. I was wondering WHY as well.
There's a world of difference between the two---moneywise. Youtube allows ads on Serpentza's videos (monetized) whereas Nathan Rich's videos are deemed by Youtube as unfit for ads (demonetized).
I don't think he's necessarily paid by CIA or organizations like that, but he's doing this purely for the money. He went to China to teach English at a medical college. When he first started doing his Youtube videos about China he wasn't anything like what he is like today. He had a semblance of...