Ukraine is close to Europe, hence Nato could support Ukraine silently through land route. But Taiwan is different case, not easy for NATO to support Taiwan.
But how?
You are talking as if Chinese warship had no defense and offense system :laugh:
Clue for you:
F-18 & F-35 range from carrier: 800km + missile range 300km, total = 1100 km
YJ-21 range = 1700km
That means 055 will be able to shoot USN ship before USN ship shoot 055. :lol:
I am afraid it is you who is talking without clue :)
Do you have any idea how long line of the sea from sea nearby korea to nearby vietnam to cover in order to blockade China ? thousands mine will not be enough!
Do you think US bombers can fly safe along the line deploying mine within 2000km...
China has so many small drone ships to sacrifice in order to open some area from mine threat, small area to be opened will be enough.
The question is: how many mines US have to isolate China's ships from entering blue sea, especially without jeopardizing ships both commerce & military from her...
Too shallow....
The gap between the largest (USN) and the second largest (PLAAN) is not that big to secure effective blockade. They are only effective again much smaller navy like those of Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, or maybe Russian, but for sure not PLAAN China with the largest qty of submarine...
How?
You want to block sea guarded with the second largest Navy in the world?
The block will be easily opened with YJ-12, YJ -18, YJ-21, Type 039, Type 093, Type 052, Type 055
This is a girl or a boy? :woot:
Not yet but steadily become lesser and lesser ... until free... then become being...
Who said Russia had way more precision guided missile than China?
Because Russia want to capture Ukraine, and Russia is weaker than China.
To make Japan and SK to become like current Ukraine will be enough for China.
Do you think US would stand a chance to destroy and occupy China?
IF Ukraine...
You should know the scenario if you challenge someone. Otherwise sound no IQ.
Once the factory/storage blown, there will be hundred missiles launched to destroy your airbase.
With what? how would Taiwan/USA will take out the DF-26 in the first place; care to explain?
Which is easier? taking out a mobile launched missile vs taking out an air base?
Mmmpphhh .... dont care abt the content of your video :laugh: ; I think I have commented that there is no intellectual value could be derived from that reply of yours. :laugh: Didn't watch either, so? :rolleyes:
I think none could be derived from this last one too; so pls dont expect me to...
You are talking about China's industrial/manufacturing power to reproduce missile during wartime vs American Officer's dilligence in Okinawa/Osan/Kunsan in repairing runway.
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
@SQ8 @gambit @Beny Karachun come... there is party about IQ :D
Really..? when did I say DF-26 is only aimed against "runway" and China will only launch single DF-26 against 1 base for runway only - as her military doctrine? it is obviously a stupid assumption applied for a total war scenario:rofl: ; and either you have reading comprehension problem, or I am...
To fix how many and deep crater? DF-26 can penetrate deeply, and another DF-26 could come again during the 6 hours time for China to buy enough time to secure her position.
You simplify the problem.
You are assuming that the airbase only hit by 1 DF-26 or hit once, and equate the DF-26 impact as only limited to the the standard bomb that create simple crater. The question is: the 6 hours time is to fix how severely damage runway?
Consider China has thousands DF-26...
I doubt it takes only several hours for material delivery + working process + drying process.; could be days the fastest.
Those fixing time will be valuable for PLAAF to secure her position. Besides the destruction target is not only the runaway of course.
Nobody said DF-21/26 can't be...