That really is the only way. IK can't wither off the the combined *** fart of PPP and N. N can be kept in check by NAB but the establishment has to come forth if Khan is to deliver in Karachi.
If the govt can successfully renegotiate the contracts, it really will be a boost for the Pakistani manufacturing sector. Our exports can become a wee bit more competitive internationally, whilst providing a huge relief to local consumers. The past govts have committed a grave crime against the...
Federation would have moved in already had it not been for a threat of removing the current govt. IK uses NAB against Sharifs and Karachi against Bhuttos to keep them in check. If he makes a move on Karachi, a dedicated Bhutto can become a real pain in the ***. That is why, it is my opinion, IK...
A dedicated terrorist will find it easy to cut through the fence and enter the country. We need a fence monitoring and pest elimination system to prevent trespassing. This is only good to keep civilian movements in check.
You know, given the reception Rafale is receiving from us, it shows it really is a threat. If Rafale isn't a threat, then stop discussing it, treat it like business as usual and the enemy will have more of a heart attack. They sell their kidneys to buy new toys and we are so unaffected that we...
The Patwaris and the Bhuttos are the worst hit due to this entire FATF saga. India actually did us a favour by dragging us into this nightmare. We will come out strong and these launderers will have a nightmare trying to send money out of the country. Like every other thing that NS did, it...
Yup won't deny that at all. All I am saying is, terming it as a game changer or by extension, inability to carry multiple SD10s a death sentence is a touch overkill.
That's not how a game changer works. PL - 15 is a game changer, AESA radar is one, highly advanced EW/ECM/ECCM are game changers, even the ability to produce a relatively less advanced suit indigenously can be termed as game changers.
Having two more missiles to lob at the enemy doesnt provide...
Exactly. It doesn't even matter if the kills were credited to the 16s or 17s. The ISPR played it amazingly well. The whole surgical strike just ended up being a reality tv peak hour advertisement for the 17s.
It would be unfair to compare JF with the likes of Rafale but it is still quite flattering.
A few years before, JF was termed as a puppy and paled in comparison to the MKIs, now, the MKIs arent even in the picture. It's being compared to Modi's deities. Well played PAF, well played.
Advanced weopon systems are not meant to be used. They are meant to keep the enemy at bay. The psychological impact of S-400 is big. Knowing that we are operating under the constant eye of the enemy is a bit unnerving.
But then again, same is true for the InAF as well. Our assets may not have...
A message to the opposition. Dont start an anti-state protest or the state will come down on hard on you. One of these says, Bhutto-ism will die, انشاءاللہ
Let's run a litmus test then, shall we. Now you have the mighty Rafales, named after your even mightier Gods, come and see if your hypothesis is correct.
We can make fun and have a good laugh but, we can't take away the credible threat that Tejas presents. Yes, the jet is 2 decades late, has experienced cost over runs but do these things somehow reduce the threat that it poses to PAF once it takes to the air with a full weapons load and sensor...
We might not want to accept this, but Tejas is a hell of a platform. Indian Airforce, albeit, at a sluggish pace is modernising rapidly. I wonder if our JF-17 B3 is the answer to every platform InAF fields.
To state that Tejas or Rafales with Indian Pilots are useless is a huge mistake and...
On the inner pylons of the wings. As a rule of thumb, the more the weight of an object, the closer it should be to the support structures (in this case, where the wings meet the aerofoil). This leads to lesser bending moments and hence increased structural endurance.