Search results

what is the point of a f-35 with aim-120 vs tomcat with an upgraded radar and aim-54 phoenix?

I can guess there is some failure in f-35 air intake double channels design witch made pressure on engine .

where is tomcat with first shot phoenix no plane has chance F35 or 22 is it outstanding top ranked or there is another ranking for winners

come on man they are made by plastic too why you are disappointed like that

good idea making small uav from plastic no radar effect cheap and light .it can be made by 3d printers :butcher:

what about thermionic reactors 400 kg I guess ? or thorium battery less than 100 kg with high voltage about 1 million every engine can make more thrust . I am not sure it is possible but it worth to try

except waterline, body's paint is so clean no scratched witch shows the skills of skipper and carefully driving at ports :crazy_pilot:

I think it is possible to use Magnetoplasmadynamic thruster for launching satellites instead of liquid or solid rockets ?! MPDT makes 200N thrust an array of for example 5 MPDTs can make 1kN thrust i guess it's enough for an small satellite and what is important is these engines can carry...

@ SC about ion thruster electricity usage I think I was wrong I didn't read whole of comment but about this plane they are using jet engine because of exhaust shape .

dear applesauce by theory you can use plasma engines for plane but in reality it needed such a high voltage (million volt) witch is dangerous and need a lot of electricity nobody made such ion engine until now and they are not using ion engine they are using one normal jet engine . except...

you can't use plasma for cooling electronic boards it makes damage for electronic parts and it is not cooler for using ion thruster it can be used but plane will be slow like glider or can't fly they want ions for making better aerodynamics and for hiding big missiles witch can not be inside...

usa strategy is based on nuke weapons like soviet without nukes your battle ships and planes are plastic toys

no it can't why you need ballistic when you can use cheaper one

we have uavs armed with anti ship missiles for higher range

they are using electro-ionic for plasma stealth and aerodynamic they want put weapons out under plasma at all these projects are totally wasting money when there are uavs

why you think Iranians should use your design standards because you are high tech ! are you high tech ? then if you are , what are you searching for ? something new in a third world country's industry Perhaps if there where not an idiot like hitler you were flying with balloons by thanks to...

Iran empire is immortal

if a day we had qaher I am sure for we Iranians no plane will be tomcat it's a part of our history because of the men who fly with it

you are wasting money I think turkey is in wrong way future is for uavs it's a good plane just for die hard movie pilot has no down side view you should repair exhaust after some hours flying f-35 is out of date now at 2014

cool:pleasantry: