Search results

Are these people illegal immigrants? If so, you cannot criticise the Libyans. It's not their job to take care of 15.000 Pakistanis.

Don't be so friggin' cheap. One, it's a cliché about Asians. Two, this rusty hand-me-down is not going to be of any good use for the Vietnamese Navy.

Ask them and they will talk about 'artificial' boundaries, tribal areas and a Greater Pathan. Pakistan's biggest strategic mistake is the absence of allies in Kabul.

It's true. He's Arab heritage, and he is a Nusayri, too, making him a member of the same sect of Bashar Al Assad's family. These people are commonly known as 'Arap Alevîleri' in Turkiye and they usually are hard-core Kemalists and Turkish nationalists which is why I laugh every time an Arab...

What a load of cr*p. Regardless of how bad or good the relationship between the EU and UK is, they will never side with Argentina or any other non-Western nation to criticise a fellow European state.

Do you feel smart for asking a question that has zero connection to what is going on in the video? Nice whataboutism.

Why do you repeat this lie over and over again? Why do you create the notion that AKP voters are pro refugee and migration? This is obviously not the case. There's a common agreement in the Turkish society that refugees and illegals have to go! Stop equating legal Pakistani immigrants to illegal...

I wouldn't compare the both. India is notoriously underperforming and this is a well-known fact even among Indian defence enthusiasts. This problem has not been solved so far. Yes, they do have a decent defence industry and nuclear bombs but given their vast financial and human resources, the...

Not in a million years. I'd rather bow down before the EU and accept every single condition than get in an alliance with the Chinese.

If it weren't a success, Putin wouldn't want to visit Türkiye next month. Erdoğan deserves a lot of criticism for a myriad of reasons but his Ukraine/Russia policy is so far a text book example of wise and proactive actions in the field of international relationships.

Erdoğan was never anti-NATO, never. He clearly, publicly and repeatedly defended the country’s membership in the alliance. His perceived anti-NATO stance is something that his groupies in Pakistan and the Middle East simply made up instead of facing the cold reality.

His diplomatic positioning of the country and involvement in the Ukraine-Russia war is widely considered to be a success, even his critics admit that. Your 'Türkiye bad!' stance is clouding your judgement.

Who is Georgio Clementi?

The Indians and their 'wanna-be-white' attitude...

Exactly. This is why nuclear weapons should only be used against non-nuclear armed nations. 😏 Does this also apply to a possible Indo-Pakistani nuclear exchange? How many people outside of India and Pakistan would be affected in this scenario?

The general public isn't aware of the severity of the situation back then. That episode took place mostly behind closed doors.

Wishful thinking. Don't get fooled. Those incidents happened for a reason. If Erdoğan had been the leader back then, he would have reacted in a similar way to foil any Greek attempt of changing the status quo. Turkey's boundaries are well known in Athens. These days they simply don't...

Not India but Apple did export that much in May.

India is a country known to be a notorious underachiever. Large areas in the country literally look like the worst parts of Africa. I will never understand what India has to offer.

Germany, Japan, US, France, UK, Russia, Sweden, Italy etc. are all much more advanced and capable than China in the field of internal combustion engine technologies. Sorry to disappoint you but you're simply lying.