Search results

from the posts here it sounds like China got a bigger buffer zone, since the supposed "Indian territory" is now no mans land. Sending 50 men to put an entire nation on edge and endless domestic political bashing is definately a win in China's books. Just think what 50 men did to the Indian...

Capitalism at its infancy, CCTV are already Starting to broadcast crackdown on unsafe food, expect more stories like this in the future.

Why compete wih Australia at all, the whole of northern territory is open to attack with limited defense. I remember last year some drunk was able to stumble into a small naval base and steal a bunch of small fire arms, just walked out of there.

Ask yourself the pattern of economic develop of some of the world's largest economies, the UK under went industrial revolution in the mid 1800s, the US is late to early 1900s, none of their economy became service oriented / information driven until the late 70s/early 80s, out of all European...

bran is the same indian that claimed China had most arable land in the world despite decade long UN reports refuting so.

none of the these proposed solutions are viable and deals with the situation facing China - India relationship to this date. The author obviously had a agenda to fulfill rather than a rational analysis. It seems the chinese have already implemented many of these "solutions" against India.

Disregarding the details, the title is right. 10 years ago, the gap betweenchina and India may have been smaller than it is today.

You once "read", but the Ganges is notorious known as the dumping site for the dead. There are certain inherent values people are born with, mixing with the dead is certainly ain't one of them.

Ganges is in a league of its own, no where else in the world would you find decaying bodies floating upstream while people bath and wash themselves down stream.

Putting billions of dollars and buying foreign made weapon system hasn't improved India's domestic defense production capabilities one bit. India in the last decade was paying annually for Russia to upgrade their own ship building infrastructure. Ask yourself was that a wise choice?

ASEAN isnt united in the first place, economic interests trumps all. Xi jinping at the recent baoao forums told the world that china will be putting a 10 trillion usd pie for people to compete for within the next few years, 400million Chinese will travel abroad and 500 billion worth of Chinese...

India trying to skip the stage of industrialization of economic development and straight into information age. In reality Indian economy is still in an elementary stage of development. Sooner or later, it will have to revert to the original model, losing a lot of time in the meanwhile.

China wont move, so the Indians really have to toughen up or shut up. The latter is more probable.

Indian experience with ToT: Foreign firm gives India firm know how. Indians tries to study it and responds with WTF. The end.

Very delusional for you to think any country will help India, china has a much more direct impact through economy and culturae on all the countries you mentioned while India has little. France and Israel are obviously no where near china. China is a p5 member, and cofounder of SCO with Russia...

People seem to think diplomatic relations are black and white, this is the 21st century countries are intertwined with one another despite differences and disputes. Take this for example, President Noynoy Aquino thanks China for funding water supply project | Sun.Star This was during july of...

That is purely your personal opinion. President Ma Ying-jeou?s popularity plunges to new low, TVBS poll shows - Taipei Times, it seems 2nd term president ma is so popular he recieved a 15% approval rating, and "A record high of 64 percent said this week they have no faith in Ma’s future...

Self sufficient? If the people were self sufficient, why did the chinese civilisation survive for 5 thousand years that is charaterised with a central form of governance. A complete top down governance system, which confucian value permeated society on every level. Chinese has never been as...

Mao's China's foreign policy on the US was 有来无回.

It seems you've taken east Asian history 101. At least you are not fully delusional and see people rules in china. Ask yourself, why is the Taiwanese have such little faith in their government while the CCP can gather so much support.