Are you acting dumb?
A AC never ventures out alone. It is well protected by a group of ships both above and under the surface. So first you have to breach the robust defence shield and even after that the chances of missile actually hitting the target is not 100% as the carrier can get mobile...
LOL. Please ask him if he was being sarcastic? I have been reading your posts for some time now and i respect the knowledge you have especially about Naval Warfare.
No one doubts that but more than going at it alone US would collaborate with India/Japan/Vietnam/Philippines. Evidence is the massive relief given to the Pinoy people. It would be interesting to see the reaction of Russia. You know people have been talking of India siding with either US or...
So much trust on your anti ship missile. Many variables need to be considered and factor those in and it is not so easy. When situation demands sure it would be put to use but lets pray that day never comes. A basic objective of procuring such platforms is to deter the enemy form doing any...
Agreed. Its very disturbing to see the delays that occur in the most critical projects which in turn puts the the effectiveness of the Navy in question. And again could you please answer my initial question about the need for 3 AC? Yes the production cannot be stopped in case of Vikrant but what...
Thanks for the read.
As the commander said the question is how many does India need? Can anyone share any thoughts about the 3 AC India wants to operate? Please share your thoughts in context of Submarines which the Navy is seriously short on.
Would it not have been right to put on hold the...
Is the AC not meant to keep away PLAN? As been said, IN can tackle PN without AC. So i have have the same question. And please can anyone also explain why we need more carriers? Is a total of 3 justified for India? What i think is what is done is done but does it not make sense to invest the...
Hehe..He has posted the same link on almost every thread. i fail to see how it relates to any topic being discussed? Maybe he is overjoyed with Pakistan purchasing something.
No this is just meant to show how they think about India. You would not see the same reaction if China launched the Mars Mission. And we are proud of ISRO and it should be not be seen as trying to belittle other country.
Does Pakistan have the same level of preparedness as it has on the Indo-pak border? In this case how much time would it take for PAF to get airborne? Anyone?
Do you seriously believe that? India does not need carriers to tackle PN. And no military buys stuff to look better than the other. IN felt the need to have one and they bought it. People can go on criticizing the decision but the fact is people in the forces know better what is required.
HAHA You are right. But, seriously both sides got into a dual with valuable input from our Chinese friends also. And i just can't see that happening again. LOL.
Oh not again!
What's the use of saying sorry when a simple search on the forum would give you numerous links about the topic at hand. Simply mean you did not bother to search.
And it has been discussed at length and a lot of trolling went on. Search it and enjoy it.
Sinking a carrier is too much for pakistan. Why don't you focus on providing basic security inside your own country? I head drones are still striking and the recent raid by US in Abbotabad is still very fresh.
Incompetent Nation. Unrealistic Aspirations.
@he-man
I agree with the points you made on the first page. As so i would like to know your opinion about the argument made everytime that we should not keep all eggs in one basket.
From whatever little i know i find IAF to be very satisfied with the French platforms hence in a way...
Doesn't always work out like that.
If the enemy doesn't believe in that what makes you think we should?
Those words don't hold true in case of pakistan.
What they need is a strong response everytime.