Search results

GSLV Mk3 I can understand because it only has 2 boosters where as CZ-3B uses 4 boosters, but for PSLV C34 it is like CZ-6 which doesn't use any boostes at all. The only explaination I can find is that CZ-6 has much higher specific impulse for all three of its rocket stage than PSLV-C34.

Althrough 14 of the 20 satellites that weighted less than 5 kg are most likely piggybacked mission, the other 6 satellites were probably sent to different orbit with different speed. I don't have any detail of the exact method but this technology is actually nothing new. The interesting thing...

The reason I said that it is not that more difficult to launch 20 satellites than 3 satellites like they usually do in last century is that back then the most important factor limits the number of satellites per launch is not rocket control technology, but rather it was contrained by the weight...

:crazy::crazy::crazy: Already did in the previous post, anyhow here it is again. Remember that was September 19, 2015, and CZ 6 rocket has done that with 1/3 of PSLV launch mass, 103,217 kg of CZ-6 vs 320,000 kg of PSLV-C34, and about the same payload capacity, CZ-6's 1,080 kg vs PSLV C34's...

Again, non of the Chinese bragged about achieving 20 satellites launch last year with CZ-6. You are the one who kept bringing the subject up here. That definitely says something here doesn't it?

Honestly that is nothing to boost about because China has already done that with CZ 6 one year ahead of India. And actually CZ 6 rocket has done that with 1/3 of PSLV launch mass, 103,217 kg of CZ-6 vs 320,000 kg of PSLV-C34, and about the same payload capacity, CZ-6's 1,080 kg vs PSLV C34's...

You are correct.

Okay, the Indian only PLANNED Venus mission so far, and now you are already claiming it made in first attempt? No wonder how india can make a 100+ exaflops computer in just 4 years, why not in just 4 month or even 4 days. Now let's assume that India indeed can make an exaflops computer right...

Nothing is signed, every party is China in just in talk with Tesla. Nothing will be signed either in the near future if Tesla itself do not solve how to supply all those already ordered Tesla car battery, because for now Panasonic Tesla batteries production can bearly keep up with the demand.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_supercomputing From the past couple decades the increase of computing power for supercomputers are quite linear, and actually slowed down in recent couple years, now can you kindly explain how in the next 4 years anyone can increase 1000 times of the...

2020, that is 4 years away from now. Let's have a look at what the fastest computer was 4 years ago. It was 16.32 Petaflops/s from Sequoia of IBM, so in 4 years the computing power of the fastest super computer just increased less than 10 times. So now someone is claiming in the next 4 years...

Recently it seems that when it comes to how to deal with China, USA and its allies often don't see eye to eye with each other. So it isn't a surprise that maybe they just don't have the consensus to block China out in the IMF. So why not support it instead as a favor to China.

Right, probably in the pockets of their politicians.

Stop those stupid comments, Japan's recorded history is much longer than Qin dynasty is. Those comments only put a dent on your own credibility.

That is the problem with history, there is not prefect way to heal the wound left by it expect time itself. People often compare Japan and Germany after WW II, however one thing they don't realize is that Germany after Hitler was a totally different country where as in case of Japan it is not...

That I don't know much about, since as far as I can remember 62's war in China is a lost memory in mainstream media. It wasn't even mentioned at all in history lessons unless you want to study it in college, most people in China doesn't even know anything about it. Maybe you can shine some...

There is continuous debate over why there was an unilateral ceasefire by PRC within China's netizens as well. What I can understand here is whatever success China was able to gain during the 62's war was not sustainable in a long run at all. Considering the stituation China was in at that...

Some one calling you a kid is indeed hilarious. Anyways can you give me a quick summary of what is the main point that you were debating? Two things I want to clarify here is that from PLA's prospective there was no way it could hold its position in India in a long run logistically nor did...

Just a minor correction here, I don't think Type 56 assault rifles aka copy of Ak-47 had wild spread within Chinese army yet, the best you can say is against semi automatic weapon as in 1962 Type 56 semi automatic rifle aka copy of SKS and Type 50 mechine pistols aka PPSh are the standard weapon...

I have never left this forum, however for the past few years I feel like stay low profile as there isn't much topic worth of my time of replying since for every response I give I need to understand the subject from many aspect. So the only post I will give my reply to are those technical stuff...