Search results

No, they don't have those missiles and they arnt integrated into SU-30s.

I don't think some people know the slang for "fap". :lol:

You are accused of using bad, abusive and unprofessional language by a very cool headed mod that has never used foul language. You can always use a search function and take screen shots of this. https://defence.pk/pdf/posts/10173333/ https://defence.pk/pdf/posts/4366585/...

You are accused of using bad, abusive and unprofessional language by a very cool headed mod that has never used foul language. You can always use a search function and take screen shots of this. https://defence.pk/pdf/posts/10173333/ https://defence.pk/pdf/posts/4366585/...

Who is killing civilians? According to you every Russian is a bastard that kills indiscriminately but every Turk is shining beacon of light. You got caught with your pants down trying to virtue signal. You are begging mods to take action about the people that slander the dead but hypocritically...

No random twitter or random Turks on PDF changes the fact that it was a Reaper, basic reports and pictures confirm it. You can tap dance all you want but this is an embarrassing thread and not for the Chinese on this forum.

1. It's a real video from the Defense Ministery. They fired the missiles in Syria. 2. No they don't don't need to change the structural design. 3. The weapons bays are large enough.

Never, the people at CNN, MSNBC, ABC, Vice, Buzzfeed, BBC, Huffpost or Compost as it's often called, NPR, etc have never lied, never lobbies to sensor conservatives, never blatantly choosen political sides, shown utter racism and outright lied. That would be RT and dozens of other independent...

You don't need to do any turn to get that vortex. Simply breaking the sound barrier will create a "fog". Those vortexes appear with very minimal G forces if the aircraft is traveling fast enough even automosphic conditions play a role in those vortexes. No it doesn't mean that, even heavy...

The patent you keep referring to completely contradicts your claims and that of online-bloggers. Just a small snippet but the rest you can read yourself and don't don't be under any illusions that just because you use google translate that you know precisely what is being said...

Nonsense, you would never know how good or poor Russian AWACS are since they don't publish anything. As for microchips, there is no one stopping anyone from buying foreign systems especially through third part vendors.

@randomradio @nahtanbob @gambit I work in the semiconductor industry. We have military contacts and civillian. we have old technology like 200k and 300k+ technology, with the older technology being the most popular because of maturity. We produce a variety of line yields and the newer...

Right because the mighty F-35 has no protrusions and the F-22 have no sloppy gaps and 90 degree corners around the rear nozzles. As for those protruding antenna? You clearly have no aviation experience. The YF-22 and F-35 prototype also had the same thing for testing, every prototype has...

I can't be wrong because I never made any wrongful claims or any claims at all unless you consider the very reasonable claim that the F-22, in my opinion, used a luneburg lens. In the HUD video the F-22 is seen darting in and out of the frame or field of view, at times the Rafale completely...

Russia is more then capable of developing VLO aircraft, the more capabilities in terms of maneuverability and sensors the less stealthy it will be because extra flight control surfaces, and sensors increase RCS due to more discontinuities and corner reflectors. If Russia wanted to it could have...

Because fanboys taught its RCS to be the size of a marble, if that is the case the Rafale must have one hell of a radar even if it was just from a few kms away.

What was his claim? "Russian propaganda" is the only thing he can claim and has claimed.

No one said anything about the Rafale seeing the F-22 first. The F-22 is taunted as being marble sized yet no radar in the world can achieve a lock on onto a marble sized target no matter how hard the fanboys claim. No shit.

Try reading the article before bringing your usual bias propaganda and trolling against anything Russian which you have a history of. From that article: "There are no exact data on the F-22’s RCS: it varies from 0.3 to 0.0001 sq. m., according to various sources. The data of Russian...