Search results

36 J-10b fighters won't cut it, if the Rafale deal is officially contracted. Pakistan would require around 60 J-10b's to balance the offset, but that's just my two cents worth. (Yes the financial constraints, will likely not allow that amount to be procured).

Jeez, this forum is inundated with a plethora of low-quality, dim-witted, acutely-depressed, indian, wannabe-trolls, roaming free. Time to control the 'virtual immigration' here and 'deport' them back to their capital 'bharat-rakhshak'. I wonder if they would be so inclined as to follow my sage...

You unsuccessfully refuted my post about China's monopoly over Asia. Insinuating your motherland enjoys that monopoly instead, like your many delusional compatriots. Go through your posts within this thread once more. Glad you agree that your country has little to no control of Asia, nor is it...

So back to the topic, care to explain india's monoply over Asia?, please enlighten us with your 'devine wisdom', such knowledge may be lost otherwise. Ps. Just to shed some more light on my point from earlier. India has lost the following area (Approx). Pakistan: Approx 804,000km (squared)...

Umm whoever said i was indian? Wow this is awkward on your part. Now rush to your medication drawer and take those 'Depakote' tablets. Take one-three times a day. Should help alleviate some of your acute-depression and help you build some confidence to leave the house on a regular basis. Ps...

You're clearly a 'slow burner' in the thought process... Overall you have lost the most land. That's the point, if you cannot fathom that, leaves a lot to be desired in regards to your critical thinking. You have no response or any solid arguments. Keep offering your low-quality trolling. Thus...

Let us not forget, Pakistan may have lost Bangladesh with the help of Russia and and the mukti-bahini. But india has lost Pakistan, Bangladesh and a 'happy chunk' of Kashmir. You just walked into that one, ouch!

Great post. India has a clear monopoly over Asia, this notion was strengthened with Pakistan's abject surrender of it's controlled part of Kashmir in 2013. More recently, india's tenacious pressuring of China by flexing it it's military- might, ultimately saw the latter, conceding it's...

Things just going from bad to worse, hopefully power is restored and some semblance-of-sanity prevails.

The government of Pakistan is 'inept' in every sense of the word. Each tenure of a new leader is marked by much corruption and is mired in acute-nepotism. The army is the only facet of Pakistan, that is free of this ignominy and wholeheartedly serves it's nation. Salute the army and stand behind...

The government of Pakistan is 'inept' in every sense of the word. Each tenure of a new leader is marked by much corruption and is mired in acute- nepotism. The army is the only facet of Pakistan, that is free of this ignominy and wholeheartedly serves it's nation. Salute the army and stand...

TTP won't be around for much longer i suspect. Not in Pakistan anyway. After that Pakistan should seal the border with Afghanistan, create a fence along the entire-stretch. With a sufficient amount of personnel and guard towers. Then tighten the security around the Iranian border, as the...

Well the JF-17's are meant to replace the existing ageing fleet and will represent as the minimum level fighter planes in Pakistan's Air Force. It is going from strength to strength, though the F-16 is in a heavier class of fighters, i suspect block 2/3 of these birds will be comparable...

This particular group whom have designated themselves as the TTP, was not created by Pakistan. Though it's now seen as an offshoot. It's very simple really, when you stop and actually read with your full attention span. What we do know is TTP is an indian-sponsored-terror-group, whom mind you...

If Pakistan really must go for the F-16 option, they need to be of higher spec and a lot more of them. Around 60/70 newer models, complementing the existing F-16 fleet, potential 150 JF-17, before turning to a couple of squadrons of fifth generation fighters in the coming years. @pursuit of...

Well it's simple really, TTP wasn't created by Pakistan. India uses these terrorists, to destabilise it's neighbour and to promote a state of disorder.. Anarchy in other words. Thereby, weakening the state, stretching the army, hindering economic growth and continuing to spread mass-hysteria...

So what would your likely list look like in terms of numbers? just curious.. Im not sure more F-16's are a viable option, as they are sanction prone. Additionally, the US hasn't supplied Pakistan anything of note for quite some time. Ideally: (whilst not being overly optimistic) 150 JF-17...

How is anyone expected to discuss an issue/topic with an individual, whom fails to grasp the basics of the english language. In relation to your previous post, whether the US goes after RSS or not, isn't the point. The point being, there are countless indian-sponsored-terrorists roaming free...

You sound tired. Hop, skip and jump into bed. Sleep. I mean your discourse is making a mockery of my language.

I'm guessing he wanted the 'likely list' and not the 'wish list'.