Search results

Oh that would be a sage, prudent, astute and shrewd decision-all amalgamated into one.

Not sure about 'open borders' once the US leaves, Afghanistan will descend into 'anarchy' and a civil war will come to the fore. Most of the 'traffic' will come into Pakistan. If anything, it would be prudent for Pakistan to erect a fence along the entire stretch and have designated official...

The US is already well informed, with regards to indian-sponsored-terrorism within Pakistan. In any case, no amount of evidence would constitute as admissible in the 'eyes' of india, they inherently lean on acute-denial by shunning out-right-facts. The outgoing, US secretary of defence 'Chuck...

...Zaid Hamid giving indians more sleepless nights, than those Bollywood lasses. Good stuff.

...As long as the JF-17's appease Pakistan's growing-needs, in terms of numbers and quality.. They are primarily, meant to replace the ageing fleet and represent as the minimum-standard-fighters within the Air Force. Ps. Thus far, there is no dual-seater-trainer-variant. Which is proving to be...

...Like the army was meant to appease the demand for electricity, oil and petrol. That's what the civil-government is for you delusional-clueless-imbecile. The military, have their own-independent budget for procurements, hence the F-16 development.

Umm peter, i think i have answered your query already. You were trying to insinuate that i'm not an American, i have already professed that i have relocated from the UK. Hence, the 'British-English'. Good day. Ps. Read over all of my posts, in order to validate my claim.

Well Jit, first of all, do not misquote me, i would not say those words "Pakistani's don't care much about the Obama visit". It is a development that most are paying 'hawkesque' attention to. Well clearly you read over my post in cursory fashion, therefore neither was it thorough, nor well...

Well Peter, I was born and raised in the UK and relocated. Hence, i don't talk/chat in 'American-English'. Read over all of my posts. Ps. It's 'spelt' in the UK and 'spelled' in the US. Now jog along chap.

Thank you Mods.

...and india should stop sponsoring terrorism within Pakistan, introspect profoundly and 'don't throw stones whilst living in a glass house'. Ps. indian sponsored-BLA-TTP-terrorists say hi.

@waz @Horus @Oscar can we do something about this (indian) troll. Whom is offering nothing, but derogatory comments to the thread.

Excuse me? Rephrase your reservations/trepidations in acceptable English-discourse. I'm not partial to your deragatory nuances of the language. From what i gather, the nub of your argument is that 'collaboration' between two- strategic-partners, equates to being their "bitch"?, based on that...

Pakistan should continue to cooperate with China in all facets of life; economic, social, cultural, educational, regional security, sharing of intelligence and most importantly augment the existing defence collaborations and 'propel' them to new heights. China's 'monopoly' over Asia will only...

That's all dandy, except Pakistan needs a new leader, a selfless, patriotic soul, who will proactively and wholeheartedly serve the nation. Somebody who shall, wholly complement the well-endowed- competent-army and aggressively lobby for the armed forces to be strengthened 'significantly'...

Trying my level best to contain my laughter, I'm about ready to roll over in hysterics. Interesting post to say the very least.

I don't suppose you actually believe any part of your poorly typed out sentence? The US was never going to 'significantly' arm Pakistan, diplomacy or the lack of it. Hence, Pakistan's strategic-reorientation and being favourably disposed towards China. It's a good move, given China is the 'big...

Arrest this germ already.

Sounds good. Not too sure if that's entirely possible given the current, sorry state of affairs. Hopefully, they will have a significantly larger amount of fighters available at their disposal by 2020 max to counter the growing Indian Air Force. Just out of interest, in terms of a value, your...

Would not constitute a shrewd decision to rely on past laurels all the time.. It is of paramount importance that Pakistan acquires a greater number of J-10b's and there is a growing need to shift from this defensiveness, 'minimum deterrence' doctrine. Sure india will likely keep a significant...