@Marxist your user name needs an update reflecting the changes your mind/stand/ideology gone through.. do you even believe in Marxism anymore ??
what do you say ??
even if she was a terrorist, law of the land is to be followed.By killing her in a fake encounter you destroyed all the useful info you could have accessed to arrest other terrorists too.
I am someone who supports this ban, but only for security reasons. otherwise Govt should not inteRfere on fashion, otherwise what's the difference between taliban who impose burqua and French govt who impose burqua ban.it's good if people choose to were popular dress in host country..otherwise...
holy land ? may be mecca and madina ? not the whole country.
btw I repeat what do you say about the Chinese action ???
French ban is not on vail but any face covering dress.on security grounds as well as cultural reasons as well.
I think the effectiveness of interrogation methods will be different up on person to person. The key is to find a "right mixture of interrogation techniques at right amount for each person being interrogated."Professionals, soldiers and terrorists also are trained to take physical torture to...
The name of the game is hypocrisy, if you talk about kalath princely state in baluch same as Kashmir, in Kashmir related thread then it becomes off topic and you get infraction, but when you talk about it and post info on existing baluch related thread or you open a new thread, moderators close...
So don't you think saudi is bigger racist by not welcoming non Muslim at all ?
what do you say about Chinese province which is doing the same as France ?
would you also fight with the Islamists who beat up women for not wearing burqua or for wearing modern dresses like in your avatar ?? I yes then I would say you are honest.
It's not a shame, not anymore when lions all around the world are Fu***d up by the rats, yes it could be a shame for a lion who fed and protected the rats to say now that I am being f****d by the same rats.
We have been suffering from cross border terrorism, I don't know whether it's lack...
http://www.defence.pk/forums/china-far-east/242643-xinjiang-focus-us-foreign-policy-3.html#post4092701
@Jessica_L would you do the same in China where they banned the same ? @SUPARCO and your comment on this please.
I am with iaf in this decision, I myself and I think large majority of our people are not comfortable with the situation where one of our women being captured by enemy. Ofcourse majority of pdf Indians were against my opinion.
some new info coming.
http://www.lexingtoninstitute.org/library/resources/documents/Defense/aircraft-carrier-invulnerability.pdf
U.S. Carrier Group tactics - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
in the light of this new info.
1. outer layer should be
CAP>ASW ship and picket ships(small...
No The accompanying ships got a radar range of 400km and Sam coverage of 70 km so they obviously will be operating at least 100km to make use of full range of it's defence systems and reduce reaction time need if some fighter jet sneak in and the first ship missed it, or a missile the first...
it's not a good practice, because even though the management is Christian all students are not Christian, teachers salary is and other grands are from govt.what they should do a universal prayer song, I guess atheists wouldn't mind that.