Search results

I dunno what you are complaining about.At their worst day, the Spaniards are better than your middle easterners.

If it was BCCI's daftness seems to be increasing each year.

Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Myanmar all are countries that matter. Right now while Bangladesh and Sri Lanka may be small economically, but so were most other countries at some stage. Bangladesh and Lanka both have high growth rates and will without a doubt have big economies in a couple of decades.

One of the reasons apart from humanitarian concerns that India itself worked in 1971 as a revenge for Pakistan starting the war in 1965 under Operation Gibraltar - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia We paid Pakistan back in kind for what it tried to do in 1965. You are right, it is the best kind...

We are going around in circles. Indian maoists have not been attacking other countries, heck they have been receiving help from Chinese for decades.They have to be able to dominate in India before hitting neighbours, so far they are completely occupied internally. Actually, yes, I do trust the...

Man, I am tired of repeating this to Pakistanis. Go through this. Pakistan initiated/started the war in 1965, hoping to take Kashmir. Operation Gibraltar - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia It ended up defending its territory and losing more land to India than it had before it started the war...

Are you suggesting that in retaliation, the aggrieved party that retaliates is supposed to loose? Ofcourse when we planned a retaliation, we planned to win. If Pakistan did not want to loose a part of its territory, it should not have attacked India in 1965. We learnt the trick of the trade...

Yeah, that is like saying Communists have been attacking in Europe. Just because the term is generic of a class of people doesn't mean its the same groups. Our Maoists are in Indian hinterland, not border areas. Our particular group has been exclusively focused on India. They don't wish to take...

Says who? Who decides the rules? You? Very convenient. Pakistan did Op. Gibralter against India in 1965 that started a full blown war. That is called aggression. It was a period when we India was unprepared having just a war to China in 1962. India took exactly what Pakistan did in 1965 and...

Waited 50 years? We are discussing 1971 here...and you asked me or rather told me that India creating an uprising in East Pakistan(then) was aggression and not retaliation. I just pointed it out that India took the leaf from Pakistan's book based on what Pakistan tried on India in 1965. What...

They already did, the last war between Israel and Hamas/Hezbollah started because they captured an Israeli teen and executed him.

Are you looking to emigrate :lol:

Why is there a need to 'save face'. Pakistan started a war with the goal of capturing kashmir(land) ..... and ended up losing more land to India. If you feel this is a victory for Pakistan, so be it.

We have to worry about Pakistan, because Pakistan is unable to contain its jihadistic tendencies within its borders. The Maoists or Naga rebels, do damage to India, they don't go to third countries and kill civilians there or explode in market places. The Pakistanis do. If the Pakistanis were...

Here sir: It is called retaliation because in 1965 (6 years prior to 1971), Pakistan did the exact same thing. Operation Gibraltar was the codename given to the strategy of Pakistan to infiltrate Jammu and Kashmir, a state in India, and start a rebellion against Indian rule. If successful...

Winning a tank battle and losing the war. Good for Pakistan.

The point remains entirely standing. The terrorism links whether with al qaeda or any other islamic alphabetical soup are within Pakistan. Is it entirely coincidental that Osama bin laden was also found in Pakistan. Is it entirely coincidental that the terrorists in the Mumbai massacre were...

By all means - google it. The British PM's statement is a quote from his visit to Pakistan! I hope you must know what that means. David Cameron: Pakistan is promoting the ‘export of terror’ - Telegraph

Yeah, the PM of Britain says this: Pakistan 'linked to 75% of all UK terror plots', warns Gordon Brown - AR15.Com Archive 75 % of all terrorism cases are linked with Pakistan. We all must be lying. Pakistanis were probably not involved in any of the things British PM is mentioning. The london...

Here's an idea - stop supporting terrorism in the world. Everyone who explodes or shoots with an Ak 47- whether in Mumbai or in Canada or in US or in UK turns out to be a Pakistani or have links with Pakistan. When Pakistan stops doing that, we'll talk about peace, till then... :)