Search results

here is nothing funny unless u r belong to that team of engineers who's integrating ra'ad. is there any clip related to raad launch from jft.

No my info is very very correct.The process of integration is not just plug in usb and install a software. I mentioned jft flew with only dummy Ra'ad at wing point near the center point which is a process of integration. And the people who's integrating are saying them self they don't have the...

there is no issue with Ra'ad, flights has been taken with dummy raad (just weight) meant flight profile at wings center point is not possible and the process is still going on. And I got confirmed it that pakistan still don't have access to full source code of jf-17.

Zero/lol

i can't see IFR here in pic

actually i posted about raad because you can't trust paf statements they said aesa will be there in bl-3 but now pesa came into consideration they say in public raad is tested or integrated but after so many years only raad is not even fully integrated. i am confirmed about raad 100%. with time...

Ra'ad (Haft VIII) ALCM is not tested even it is not fully integrated on jf-17.

Your logic is suitable to paf thinking.

Dose any buddy have any news about the payload inc/dec in jf-17 blk-3. Or just Aesa/HMD/IFR in blk-3. and blk-2 ifr probe?

t-37 is a bullshit jet even for training.

JF-17 can carry three external fuel tanks (2x 1100 L under wing and 1X 800 L centerline fuel tank) both Air-to-Air and Air-to-Ground role. The maximum range (3,000km) in a High-High-High mission profile is achieved in the following configuration: – Stores: 2 x PL-5E II SRAAM + 2 x SD-10A...

if u don't want to understand that why i posted the clip then i can't make u.see it again and again and think what is the meaning of posting this clip here.:police:

the video is about the air force and jf 17 is also related to air force so you think more and you will get it and by the way in this thread you will find many posts which is not related to jf-17 by any mean but they are here bcz there is no specific rules here about it.

then whats the problem?

totally agree and i think PN should go for it.