I don't know who is right, and to be honnest I don't really care because they are not the only source for me. They only come confirme, or not, other informations we can both access publicly.
I never believe if what you chinese guys called "大神". We don't know who is behind the screen, for sure...
When 星海 said it is wrong, I think he was not talking about date, but the drawing.
The bloc is clearly for the prow and not the stern. Some guys from CD are quite funny from time to time.
Henri K.
To be honnest my very first thinking when I saw this word was "What a bullshit".
So far absolutely nothing credible brings to this assumption, since I followed the pre-study of the program since 13 years.
Henri K.
I don't think I have said that it is an endo for the 2010's test. When the interception took place at 250km altitude, it was clearly an exo one.
Same thing for 2013.
For DN-1, maybe this picture gives us some hints -
Henri K.
If you mean the one with solid-liquid ramjet (SLRR), that I guess you would like to say HQ-8, and not HQ-18...
Last time I heard something about it, it seems that the development runs into trouble.
Henri K.
You mean this one ?
Henri K.
CATOBAR and STOBAR have completly different operating models, and this difference impacts fundamentally the flight deck design as well as the interior one.
It is not "just" a matter of installing "something", it is a matter of the global design of the aircraft carrier.
If since the very...
Hi 星海,
Are you sure that Wing Loong is operated by Pakistan ? The crash last month seems to be a version for trial for me. Maybe you can any confirmation from China directly ?
For CH-4, I pratically agree with you that the latest post talks about it in Jordan, but for Algeria some of my...