Nothing but cheap labor. Easily replaceable by other competent people around the globe.
Hahaha...i'm the one that's hurt? You're the one that's resorting to ad hominem attacks lol...priceless.
TCS, Infosys, HCL - The crap tier consultants companies go to when they can't afford tier 3.
lol...an Indian posts the thread, and the other Indians have the audacity to say Pakistanis are excited about a Chinese nuke sub merely berthing in Karachi.
hahahah...an Indian delusional enough to think they offer anything irreplaceable to the Americans! All you offer is terrible call-center...
I wonder how Indians would react when they'd come to know that Pakistan has deployed sub launched cruise missiles with nuclear warheads since 2012.
Source: Multiple insiders
Thanks! I know how hard it must've been to swallow your pride and say that. Means a lot.
Great achievement.
1. For those talking about low cost of launch, isn't that because the ISRO's launches are subsidized by the govt
(as far as I recall).
2. The US abandoned the shuttle programme because they envisioned that due to the reuse of rockets, the cost of launches would go down -...
Whenever you're faced with numbers like these, it's a good idea to scrutinize them. Most muslims migrating to France are those that are of poor background - most escaping from their shithole of a country (i.e. like the ones you guys probably bombed or somalia, pick one). It's not much of a...
That was Ghauri, and it's not a big surprise.
However, there is no confirmation of the Shaheen series being foreign, other than speculations and blog posts (m-11, m-whatever doesn't count). though yes, shaheen probably had foreign input.
@The Deterrent
It's the latest gen alto...it's pretty modern.
Pakistan's car market isn't that huge (though has the potential maybe) to justify setting up manufacturing for new models every year (it won't be as profitable as the current model they're following).
Solution? Car manufacturers can import cars...
Oh the irony. Considering the outlandish claims of DODO and the pathetic results of their projects, the entire organization is intellectually dishonest.
You do not understand why he's being vague because, though you might be academically bright, you're a socially inept retard.
You are comparing the head of an organization that is in the public's eye, carries out very public launches and is primarily civilian, with a scientist who has worked for...
No, you seem to misconstrue interpretation as fact. I'm not denying India's entry into NSG will be used as an excuse by China to introduce Pak in the group.
You seriously have problems with reading comprehension. I'm not going to argue further.
There's no contradiction. It's the nuance in the language you aren't getting. If China says "If India gets in, we're going to get Pakistan in too" that does not mean "ONLY if India gets in, we'll get Pakistan in too." The latter statement is what you have understood to be the case, which is...
It says IF India gets membership by any chance, China will pursue getting Pakistan membership too. You're misinterpreting it by saying "ONLY" when India does.
A declassified State Department report has noted that India was in a position to develop nuclear weapons as early as 1964....the report...
May I remind you of how you guys stole nuclear tech from the CANDU plants in India? Your dhoti ain't so white.
Way to twist words. Either you failed in your reading comprehension, or you're trolling.