Search results

His point is RAW, CIA and Mossad

Too soon.

Sorry. It requires a lot of other technologies including know-hows and material science to create complex things like engines. Just a copy wont do. That is why pakistan, china or india haven't able to come up with their own engines (well, in case of latter 2, it is jet engines). Ofcourse, you...

More like firing from your side stopped. So we stopped responding. Now, you have to tell us why your army stopped firing..

This threw me into a loop. Pakistan is ready for "unconditional" talk on "condition" that they won't accept any of India's condition. Then how is pak ready for unconditional talks?

I would take "OP's wishful thinking" for $1000.. There is no such capability wit PN..

There is another thread about IA destroying the OPs of PA.. you can clearly see that PA op is built in a populated area.

If you observe, PA doesn't give out their KIA names, unlike IA. It is just numbers. I suspect it is to hide their real casualties. They would have told 100s of families that their loved ones are "among the 7". This is really a disservice PA is doing for their soldiers.

Don't forget the "using extreme skills" part..

They are captured relics..like how we display captured pak tanks...

Of course they are. If it were even a patrol boat, they would have used extreme skills to chase it away..you know, international law only allows arresting the weak and the unarmed only..

Well, have you read sections 50 to 55 and 87?

Yeah, no. The one you mentioned is for "STRAIT". it is entirely different than EEZ. Straits are Infact territorial waters but UN has allowed navigation, hence heavy restrictions. EEZs aren't territorial waters. Wonder how come you don't know the difference between the 2.

It depends on the mission. If it is going on a goodwill visit or a port call, it doesn't need to be submerged. Same with maintainance visits... The same international law which requires subs to surface while transiting eez? The law allows you to impound the vessel and impose penalty. It is like...

Well, I can't say for sure from infra video. But if it is, then it is a major fail on PN. You guys arrest poor fishermen but let a sub go?

It might have had the flag up, but it isn't visible in the picture.

Indians did conquer indians always.. but earlier there were rules, common people weren't touched, religious places weren't touched and women and children unharmed. But these religious marauders came here for wealth and women.. that is why barbaric. Anyway, even those who were born in india...

Why do you think any one was eyeing you at all? India does deploy it's sub in coast of Africa, ME and it would be a transit route. Not only for IN, but to any navy coming east or going west..

Whatever the reason. Well they were Indians in the fact they were born in india. But their rule was too short for them to culturally assimilate completely.

It was definitely a transitory movement. But the sub is still unidentified. UNCLOS says the sub and ship need to fly the flag. But no flag was shown in the photos released. IN has denied any movement. Who knows which country that sub belonged to?