Search results

So all the ancient sources on the origins of Chandragupta Maurya can go for a toss because you believe so that he was a Punjabi :lol: Have some shame Shan BTW Maurya was not just a name it's a Kshatriya caste .

People living east of Indus and having Indic culture were called Hindus untill some cowards cave into to their new masters and got Arabized :lol:

Give me the source for Chanakya's birth not your fake insecure laughter. Chanakya was a Hindu Brahmin, never knew Pakistanis had so much love for Hindus . Maurya is a khsatriya caste not just a name :lol: I thought you were better than that

Porus was a proud Hindu not a forcefully converted sissy like you. He fought till the end the characteristic you clearly lack ;) How can people with no self respect like you guys who gave in to any marauding invader easily claim a warrior like Porus

Jain source say Chanakya was born in South India , other sources say North India, Buddhist sources say Taxila, how can we say the Buddhist one as legitimate . Where are the Mauryas in Pakistan now btw :lol:

Did the Mauryas moved en masse to Bihar after the partition , where are the punjabi Mauryas today in Pakistan:omghaha:

Porus is called an Indian king in Greek sources.

Ironically for you the bhaiyas from Bihar conquered the martial race :sarcastic:

He acted according to the circumstances prevailing at that moment and now I'm asking you to enlighten me as to how he could have "acted smart" as propounded by you so that the British had to leave India in the 30s itself.

Is that a personal attack? Dont act like a dimwit and cry like a sissy, make fun of any hindu practice for all i care.

Where's the personal attack Mulla Abdul Khan K****. Stop puking thru your ***

That was an error on my part, got carried away a bit. :D

There were no Mauryas at that time it was the Nanda empire . "Alexander intended to march on and cross the River Ganges toward further conquests, but his troops, worn out by the hard-fought battle with Porus (in which, according to Arrian, Alexander lost 1000 men), mutinied and refused to go...

Seleucus Nicator had a larger empire than Alexander and he sure was defeated by Chandragupta Maurya incase you didn't know ;) Read more about revolt of Alexander's army at the Hydaspes river, its according to the Greek sources.

That is because Alexander made him his satrap. When Seleucus marched across the Indus he clashed with Chandragupta Maurya who gave him a bloody nose. Apparently it was a Bihari bhaiya Chandragupta Maurya who freed your tall and handsome people from the Greeks and ruled over you ;)

He was afraid of Nands'a army aka Bhaiyas :lol:

A responsible government must be established immediately and in full, both at the centre and in the provinces. The Untouchables were Hindus and should not be treated as a "minority". There should be no separate electorates or special safeguards for Muslims or other minorities. But last two...

There was no way Gandhi or for that matter any leader could have got any big concessions from the British at the round table conferences given the British were at the peak of their power. The British had already suppressed Civil Disobedience movement ruthelessly after the 1st RTC so it is...

Both Nastaliq and Devanagri, depending upon who was writing it.

Hindi and Urdu were Hindustani before the 18th century, with the rise of communalism and adoption of differet scripts the Urdu became more Persianized and Hindi became Sanskritized. This was when Hindustani was declared the official language replacing Persian , which was to be written in...