Search results

Sure, take that to UN or whoever listens. As for Muslim majority, we'll see as the Pandits have to brought back. No desire to get into history here. Ok, if that makes you feel better about the situation. Any bigger surrender post WWII?

Yes, yes, I've heard that hundreds of times. You also should not have had 90K soldiers to be part of the worst post WWII surrender. India could have extracted a lot more form those PoW, our silly leaders did not. That's a separate story. As for wanting to live peacefully, I want nothing to do...

I'd not term limited strikes inconsequential in the long run, however that's a separate debate. The cost/benefit analysis there was flawed but that's a separate thread. Pak people are inconsequential to the equation here as they don't have a say. Besdies that, I see no difference from the...

You guys have been trying to liberate Kashmir since '48. You have only moved backwards in that regard. In the interim, you lost East-Pak.

Sure - will happen in the coming years, your country is not going to stop its terrorist activities. I don't want war, I merely find it inevitable.

Ah here come excuses. Just as you find excuses for '71, you'll find excuses for another logical reason to not dare to use nukes. The only indicator is the past. No one is going to take your word for it. In the past, in the most extreme of situations, you surrendered rather than fight...

Obviously. Otherwise, there'd be no framework to resolve anything. On the other hand, Pak doesn't honour Simla agreement - no third party involvement.

Read the resolution. First step is yours - do that and get back to us. If not, you have no ground to ask anything from India.

So you skipped why you did not carry fighting in '71 - as expected. Address that and we can move to 2001 and 2008. To repeat, in the most extreme of situation, your establishment accepted defeat and ordered the biggest post WWII surrender.You didn't have the courage to fight to your destruction...

Go read the resolution. It requires removal of your troops from Kashmir - do that.

Indian Kashmiris already have the right to vote. If you mean referendum, go read UN resolutions and what steps are required. Your country has refused to meet the very first of them. I am sure the Indian military is not as naive as me, and neither is the Pak one as silly as you. You can claim...

So you are Spartan wannabe? Different time, different situation. They didn't have the power to wreck a whole region and render it uninhabitable or stall the global economy. You believe we do not already have "justified provocation" based on past terror attacks? By your logic, why not have...

The impact of a nuclear war would hardly be limited to India and Pak - this is key. The entire region would be wrecked. Yet more reason that nuke bluff is precisely that - a bluff. You and our hosts here are welcome to their faith in it though. By the way, you do understand that Pak's nuke...

Brilliant analogy. So you're only going to claim earth is not flat or go about disproving it? I hope to see your crusade to alter the system of democratic representation worldwide. :tup:

Your logic implies the world is full of fools who go along with this system and you are the exception. Congrats. :wave:

Assertion with nothing to back it up. Should just skip this. Simple - no demonstrated capability to do any of what you claim. You have to establish that you are capable, no one needs to establish that you are not. What are the guiding systems in your missiles? Who controls them and much more...

Dude, your leaders just carry out a coup and don't even bother getting elected, so calling others psychopaths is silly. Your other points have been discussed ad nauseum and are no longer of any significance. You are welcome to continue discussing them. My only point was any elected leader...

Personal insults - the final refuge of one out of arguments. :lol: You want specific ways? Plenty - sharing intel on your nukes locations, even joint action to prevent this madness. Who controls the guiding system your missiles use? Who can disable them? Disclosure of other sensitive secrets...

That's true worldwide - ask Republicans how Obama represents them or Democrats how Bush represented them. Nothing unique about Modi in this context, thus, no need to single him out.

Not a fan but Farage certainly talks more sense than any of other leaders. His speeches in the EU parliaments are hilarious. The one about the EU army against Russia was particularly funny. Anyway, we can only wait and watch, I fear for those who will suffer from both sides due to these insane...