Search results

Is millitary dictatorship a solution then?? Stop giving names to democracy. Its what you have got after years of protests. DO not victimise it unnecessarily. Democracy does not guarentees perpetual supplies of cheap ration. It simply implies your selection of your representatives was not good...

What makes you think that?

Stop watching PTV then and come to Jammu Kashmir on 26 January.

Technically its not a war. PA is fighting its own people here. Its much of a millitary offensive. And will end when the millitary decides to step back.

If its your pic on your profile ?

We are not discussing about India here. Is it too difficult for you to understand??

Do you need to hang him for saying so?? I thank god a thousand million times that I am not born in China.

Thanks for the links mate. One thing that i cannot overlook here is that the officer was unnecessarily pressing too much on the b006s of the cadets while putting up the batches on their chest. It made me :bounce: :bounce: :bounce: video time : 00:24 - 00:32 seconds Any comments here ??

Maybe turkey is playing the role of a double agent here by joining APSCO.

Yes, directly launch millitary satellites. That is exactly what this technology is meant for.

It was signed four years ago. How many satellites did pakistan and bangladesh launch after this??

Which war are you talking about?

well, the poor guy is a "dissident" and not a hardened criminal. if china can annihilate thousands of innocent dissidents in tinamen square and elsewhere, then this chap is no big deal. @ china and chinese : Have a heart.

What an emotional logic !!!

The puppeteers are :- USA, Saudi, China

Have faith in god. All will be fine.

Its good that you did not put up the same old UN indices and numbers again this time. Thats quite a change, and quite a thread saver too :victory: There is no need for India to leap ahead of china. As Indian PM mentioned it in US, "India is not interested in oppressive chinese model of...

We are not equating the popularity of some magazine to be evidence of its worthiness in content and analysis. Popularity is not the true indicator here, By that logic Zaid hamid is factually the most correct person on this planet. And there are many other tom, dick , harry , uddins and ullahs...

Care to explain how? I appreciate your confidence here but really pity your intellect when you put up such worthless claims.

This news seems to be made up. Any credible source please??