I said the same thing that no matter how bad Nawaz was, Musharraf did more harm than good. Musharraf ended up sucking India's and America's dick more than Nawaz or anyone else.
And what I wrote about Kargil is a fact, not my opinion. You can have your opinion which may be subjective but facts...
Nawaz became India lover after that affair.
Nawaz had supported the army through and through during the Kargil war. I do not need to prove myself as it is well documented. However, a smear campaign was launched against him by the khalai makhlooq after the fiasco and he was blamed for "forcing"...
That is understandable.
However, that is not the trend in many armed forces . For example US military uses m4, m16 and minimi; only m240 is of different caliber. Furthermore, what crossed my mind was the presence of different calibers complexifying logistics and tactics. That came to my mind...
What was the need for type56-II if type56 worked fine? Or was paucity in numbers(SMG) the reason to order type56-II?
G3 is also being used. Why are two types of rifles in use? Wouldn't it be better to use single type or single caliber ?
There was another rifle of 223 caliber made by POF which...
When the most celebrated General of Islam was removed from command, he obeyed the command of his caliph instead of marching with his forces towards Medina and overthrowing the supreme leader. Compare that to the attitude displayed by Musharraf.
And comparing Musharraf to those Islamic rulers is...
Add his mishandling of Baluchistan issue to the list as well.
He brought Pakistan to the brink of internal collapse.
There were no limits to that alliance. No negotiations, just prostrating infront of each and every demand thrown at us without any quid pro quo. Result was a disaster of epic...
Sanghis also employ similar arguments against the literature and news reports published against them. That they are baised, and that something written by a gora doesn't make it credible.
You sound no different than the political elite of West Pakistan who told the people here that all is well...
I was not talking about Shah Jehan or intermixing of Moghuls with local Rajputs.
Bloodline and identification continues with father. A Malik man marries a Rajpoot woman; Their son wont be a Rajpoot, he will be Malik... his lineage will be traced from his father's bloodline... Bhutto-Zardari...
There is a ton of literature on that particular topic. I am sure not all of it is written by Pakistanis with an agenda of their own. Now you and your compatriots are definitely going to declare that all of them(authors and journalists) are lairs and propagandists, trying to defame the world...
Keep on supporting the occupation. You and @Joe Shearer both like all of India.
The support enjoyed by Indian forces in Kashmir or lack thereof is known by the entire world ; there is no need to argue or prove otherwise as it is as clear as broad daylight; unless you are a sanghi or a closet...
Yes, many do condemn that in Pakistan unlike the Indian army which is above all criticism. In any case, that was over 50 years ago, and isn't happening as we speak.
You can talk about Bangladesh when Kashmir is free like it, otherwise feel free to shut your trap.
Country se bakhshwana apne aap...