Sir,
I have read more than enough, I disagree with you land east indus is India, lets not use india and use hindustaan instead, because the brits couldn't pronounce Hindustaan so they called the whole south asia as India instead.
All the muslims rulers be they ghauris, tughlaqs, Mughals...
I was trying to say india had become more like a humiliating name during brits time and nehru should chosen something indigenous and not something meaning slavery
All these name mean colonialism, Hindustan was name given by muslims invaders, india by greeks,
However i disagree with you that the name hind, india was applied to both india pakistan,
name Hindustan only became popular after the capture of delhi, Note pakistan region was already under muslim...
I agree sir, but that was colonial term, it was more associated with slavery, now its different.
Please differentiate between an empire and country, Before 47 there was an empire known as Brit Indian empire but now it a country known as india, Obviously the two are not the same, We were forced...
Again you people think the indians of british raj are the same as present day indians,
During british raj we were slaves, our country was occupied and we were given the identity of indian by brits, we indus people have more right over the name india given the fact it came out of our river...
What? Pakistan movement started soon after 1857 mutiny, Sir syed ahmed khan in 1800's was the one of the first to ask for separation
You are obviously anti-pakistani and you know nothing about pakistani founding father and you keep insulting our founding fathers indirectly.
Choudhry Rahmat...
Sir,
I wasn’t expecting this kind of question from someone like you; If Allama Iqbal didn’t want the formation of Muslim majority state in North West of British India then who wanted. Iqbal was the one who persuaded Jinnah to come back from England and change his Indian nationalism...
Sir,
I already told you even if the entire punjabi population was muslim, rape, looting and destruction would still have occured, and regarding the name of missiles, Pushtuns claim Mamud ghazni and ahmed shah as their heroes and both of them were pushtuns so pakistanis have a claim on these...
Nalwa,
I disagree with your first part that India starts with the plains, India is a recent word let's use Hindustaan because the brits couldn't pronounce Hindustaan so they called the whole south asia as India instead.
All the muslims rulers be they ghauris, tughlaqs, Mughals, khiljis used...
Most of what you wrote is hogwash
I don’t listen to zaid hamid since I don’t live in Pakistan. It is India which started terrorism in South Asia, In General Menakshaw memoir he wrote 80,000 Bengalis were trained to fight Pakistan army and spread destruction, chaos, looting, rape and...
Pakistan and the present day india both shared the humiliating name of india during british raj.
Do you people even know that british used to equate indians with dogs. signs of “dogs and Indians not allowed” were often posted at private clubs
and even some public spaces, like...
I can also write something similar about india's economy but i dont want to start an arguement. Pakistan has surmounted many challenges in the last 60 years, and it will face many more in the future but it will never fall. Pakistan has seen indian terrorsim in 1971 east pakistan it still...
How does this make the prensent india as the continuation of british empire
And as far as the treatise are concerned i read somewhere that all the treatise signed by british before 47 becames null and void after independence of pakistan
Sir
How does india existed before 47, there were 570 princely states, 13 provinces which british empire called India,
Before 47 there was an empire not a country called india,
There is a difference between an empire and country, Are you trying to say you are the continuation of british...
Sir
Pakistan has always maintained higher growth rate than India, It was only after 2002 that India growth rate overtook pakistan's growth rate, India's meager success in the past decade doesn't guarantees it will always be able to maintain the same growth rate.
At independence Pakistan's...
Before 1947 the non- muslim population was around 15-20% in the region today known as pakistan, More than half of them were sikhs, Most of the hindus were brought to sindh by british because of Karachi's economic boom, after partition most hindus left for gujrat and rajasthan. By 1951 there were...
Sir we have shared history no denying from me, But the shared history only starts after Ghauri invasion,
My source is Indus Saga which doesn't mentions anything about gupta rule, pala rule in pakistan, The book says pakistanis are different from indians, culturally, historically and...