Search results

again, i ask, does such a deep friendship happen by chance? ofcourse not. i said compared to saudi they are, point is if you are against that type of society, then why make allies with saudi;s, why give saudi's a free pass? clearly there is a massive contradiction you cannot answer. millions...

but how can you downplay this as a miscalculation? it clearly looks like the opposite to me - A CALCULATED move to be allies with suadi's, just as they support extremist - hard facts are there, hence this whole concoction of a clash of civilisations is lw level rhetoric, ignorant of the reality...

1. this "difference" - for who is that meant to be consolation? only yourself ofcourse. because its happened to thousands of people. and when you make a mistake a thousands times its not really an accident. and if you are indifferent to this same mistake happening thousands of times it shows...

this is bush type rhetoric, making a bigger enemy then really exists - to justify bigger wars, more violence. you have UNCRITICALLY mixed propaganda, media hype to come to the conclusion that there is some clash of civilisations, that there is infact an opposing civilization, its mostly...

1. the west brought the war zones to those countries, hence responsible for the war zone. the people of baghdad and tripoli also did not consider their cities a war zone, did anyone ask them? you have a totally indifferent attitude to the many thousands killed by western soldiers and weapons -...

mods should ban comments like these, you are trying to egg on a race war in the west - muslims vs europeans , indians try and stay away and watch from far (typical ofcourse).

firstly you are missing the question, people dying in other countries is not a myth, its happening, and on a large scale by western soldiers ad equipment - this is ignored - not saying an eye for an eye, but its ignored. secondly, your second sentence is a joke, other muslims didnt ask the west...

is that not true? does this killing now make it illegitimate to point out the many thousands of innocents that have died in current wars?

You dont really understand your country, certain hate preacher's are invited..... Most of the immigration policy is opendoors and they know it is, this demographic change isn't a surprise........it's intentional, welcome to reality buddy.

Well said, you seem like An Indian who has a good understanding of what's needed, welcome:)

there is a selective and minimal concept of conscience and honour in pursuit of empire and domination. the western press does not care that it is flagrantly hypocritical, nay outrageous, that they can support medieval militants in one nation, yet chastise another nation for not doing enough...

nuclear fall out will probably leave both countries crippled, iran and bangladesh will feel pain too.

india may well be worried that in the face of conventional superiority pakistan's only choice is to lower the nuclear threshold so as to scare india....not a strategy i am that comfortable with i have to say...

exactly this, the idea of a sino-india war for example is actually a disaster for the region!! you would think that the people of asia would realise that their historical track record of the past 3 hundred years was based on being divided and therefore conquered....and its still happening to...

seriously, war is in no ones interest here, everyone needs to calm down. i am not being biased here, but the afghan people need to re-evaluate some of their views. as long as they believe what they do it will always compel them to hate their neighbors, in fact they will always be compelled to...

Are you for real? Do you believe this nonsense? You are a war torn and war ravaged country but you still want to pick a fight. and the greatest offence to you is not what's happening to your people but their depiction in a TV show - is this actually a serious opinion?

guy like him are, or TEND to be ex-criminals cum loud mouth attention seekers.....just watch the trend.....they hi jack discourse because they are given a platform...this is what you need to consider....

you know i would wager than any islamic state/empire or people's throughout history that ever claimed to be "islamic" probably had something like this....it will always always exist, nothing will ever be a perfect representation of what you want....

this is perhaps what happens when people glorify the wielder of the sword over the words of the thinker....its more important to fight for the right thing, then fight because you can...

hence why some indian punjabi's, some in the UK who came from india, accuse the indian govt. of a sort of campaign to suppress the punjabi identity of sikhs - not what i am saying, what some are saying