What's new

Search results

  1. R

    History of Pakistan from 3000 BC to the present

    Why should Pakistan not accept and promote it's history that rightfully belongs to Pakistan for the most part? Every nation does so, including India, so whatever reason India has Pakistan has the same one. The point if this is to explain to Indians they have no right to claim what's not...
  2. R

    History of Pakistan from 3000 BC to the present

    India was also created after the British left, there's never been a contiguous entity known as India which even resembles current India. Historically race has been the key factor for kingdoms, and people from ivc are racially distinct to rest of India, in general.
  3. R

    History of Pakistan from 3000 BC to the present

    Indians should be thanking and praising the mullahs, they have gifted pakistans pre-Islamic civilisation to the Hindus. And the Hindus have happily accepted it. However neither party is right to do so. The history of those lands belong to the people that live there, and if the...
  4. R

    Indian schoolboy genius solves 350 year-old Particle dynamics theories.

    Not really an Indian schoolboy, he is german and obviously there is something about western system so that he could thrive there.
  5. R

    Gadkari goes gaga on Israel

    hmmm - israel is regarded as a jewish supremacist state, that treats other people (not just arabs) as sub human, a aggressive marauding mad man of the middle east. i can see why india wants to be like them, it makes them feel strong and like conquerors, but they simply couldnt pull it off...
  6. R

    Enemy of Pakistan Will be Considered As Enemy of Iran: Ahmadinejad

    iranians have been playing pakistan and india as and when they want. i can guarantee that if india was not listening to us dictates on trade then iran WOULD NOT be saying this. iran has consistently shown that india will always be warmly welcome if india is willing to do likewise. i am...
  7. R

    US declares 'total war' on Islam

    So because the us is not nuking Islamic countries it's not at war? Wonderful logic. Just take a look at what us soldiers do in Afghanistan/Iraq - you telling me most of those soldiers don't think they are at war with a religion? Or how about the persistent negative propaganda and psy...
  8. R

    US declares 'total war' on Islam

    What do you mean if? The us is culturally, ideologically and militarily attacking pretty much every Islamic country, in some form or at some time. Moreover, the propaganda is so intense that the more gullible and unthinking Americans (majority) have mostly internalized this war and...
  9. R

    Pakistan compounds US tensions

    Your first para implies that if Pakistan/us had substantial trade this embassy would be perhaps acceptable, I think that's very vert wrong. No nation should be allowed to have such a massive base in Pakistan. Also, this should more than raise a few grumbles, this embassy is basically a...
  10. R

    Amnesty says OBL raid, Drone Strikes unlawful

    Pakistanis are falling into the trap of hoping the western system will correct itself to help Pakistan. It won't. Human rights is a concept that has been weaponised and is already being used to further imperial conquests and erode the sovereignty of nations - never lose sight of that, an...
  11. R

    U.S. bristles at stiff Pakistani NATO fees

    Dude, that was a non starter, to understand the pak us/pak relationship you simply need to listen to what Musharraf was told about being bombed back to the stoneage - there's no room for strategic development when America is acting like a global mafia boss.
  12. R

    NATO Summit: Pakistan Offers No Quarter

    Once again I wonder, if Pakistan haggling and blocking now will be an impediment to NATO leaving then is Pakistan not doing the wrong thing? Should it not bf facilitating the NATO timeline. The time to get proper rates for transit has passed, the political climate couldn't be worse...
  13. R

    NATO Summit: Pakistan Offers No Quarter

    Do you have a source for the central Asian route fee's? That would be useful information. Anyway, much of this seems too little to late, these guys have only gotten their act together when the knife is on their throat.
  14. R

    On Afghanistan, the Pentagon Has Lost the American People

    err it has the right to do so on a pre emptive basis, with whatever force it deems appropriate and at whatever cost it deems appropriate. in terms of afghanistan it was attacked by saudi's but they attacked the ENTIRE nation of afghanistan using full military force and occupying the lands for...
  15. R

    On Afghanistan, the Pentagon Has Lost the American People

    a spot on job? lol, they invaded nations that posed no threat to them on a falsified basis, the statement a "spot on job" is based in a false dichotomy, and because of that everything they have done is a disaster, they have made the world a bloodier, more unstable place, for the american people...
  16. R

    On Afghanistan, the Pentagon Has Lost the American People

    As usual you gone too far with your sycophancy. I do not mean to say that you should not protect yourself from outside powers ruining development and prosperity, this can never really be something wrong to complain about per se, for example just look at how much the Americans bitched about...
  17. R

    On Afghanistan, the Pentagon Has Lost the American People

    There is no point in identifying hypocrisies hoping that the system will correct itself to fairness and justice. The European and Anglo saxon world created this "world system" to favour their own nations. If you want a solution, look at china, they got their head down and turned their nation...
  18. R

    On Afghanistan, the Pentagon Has Lost the American People

    Any country that the seeks to protect itself is regarded as double dealing. I think most of the world believes that the us has been double dealing justice and humanity itself.
  19. R

    Iranian Azeris Set up National Council in Turkey, Aspire for Independence

    crazy moves by the turks to facilitate the break up of a neighboring nation, very bad move, especially at a time when unity is needed.
  20. R

    US-Pakistan feud, French pullout decision overshadow NATO summit

    If America needs these routes to wind down then surely pak should be facilitating this. This current quarrel seems like it should have happened years ago. How stupid will it look if the us say that it's because of Pakistan they can't leave. He is representing the policies and practises...
Back
Top Bottom