I don't know about the masterminds. Or who they are or who they work for. But I'd say it'd be worth finding out. But, are WE ourselves doing enough?
I know for a fact that the Japanese and Italians are NOT happy. And both of them are NATO allies. They'll get to the bottom of the matter no...
The militant outfits are locally grown. ISIS doesn't have any operations here. That bloody Canadian is dead.
The weapons and explosives used in the Gulshan siege apparently came from India according to Bangladeshi authorities. It is alleged that ex-major Zia and his cohorts are hiding in India...
If that is true, then it is great. It is not the weapon that concerns me. It is how we are going to sustain that system in a war scenario. I'm sure the military has this in mind.
It reminds me....'It's not the size of the hammer than counts, it's how you wield it!' :lol:
What!? Who the? Are you ****ing serious? The BNP were bribed by the Burmese junta with a ruby necklace to Khaleda Zia!? :woot:
I know this would sound stupid, but do you have any proof of this?
Hey @idune miah, you reading this?
I really don't know what to say...
http://www.airrecognition.com/index.php/archive-world-worldwide-news-air-force-aviation-aerospace-air-military-defence-industry/global-news-2015/august/1936-russia-s-mig-35s-multirole-fighter-aircraft-could-enter-service-in-2018.html
Albeit, a small number.
The Russians will operate a handful...
And that is your answer in regards to a woman as a head of state? :lol: One that shows her face in the presence of men? It's either you are mad or you are being a funny man.
And you think I don't know that already in regards to state religion? Do you understand what a theocracy is? You have a...
The MiG-35 is what is akin the American F-18 Super Hornet. The Russians have been way too slow in developing the MiG-35. Albeit purposefully I'd wager. The Americans on the other hand deployed the SH way back in the late 1990's. Why such a huge gap? Are the Americans more efficient than their...
Well, not only that. We have to sustain and win the war don't we? And that with a dangerously unstable nuclear armed-country run by a religious nut job. Now that is some serious mind-bending we have to do don't we? But there's time for that.
And like I said, it's all about the doctrine we have...
Having a heavy fighter as our backbone is not rational. The Su-35 has got teeth, no doubt. But as with all Flankers, they are heavy. They are called 'flying tanks' for a reason..
And neither would it be rational to source sensitive parts all the way from Russia.
The Yak-130 is a good trainer...
It's still a generalization. Neither the Americans or the Russians would risk armed conflict with one another. Doing so would give the factions in Syria an advantage along with other consequences.
It is what we require. And not somebody else's requirements.
Best thing is not to reply to them like some d*ck-measuring contest. Those kind of nationalist always remain that way - Unable to have a proper discussion.