Search results

If one of them is shot down in enemy territory then this nation filled with Feminists & Liberals would pressurize the govt to bring her back at all costs, since she is a woman held by enemy male soldiers. Pakistan would have the perfect card to play to derive concessions.

JF-17 can kick J-10's arse according to PAF pilots and many people here & PAF would not buy J-10s. Stratrgy Page? Oh you mean J-10 being a piece of maintenance intensive junk, see even strategy page acknowledges that.

In 2008 PAF did nothing, except for some cheap airshows over their cities to put up a brave face.

So JF-17 outperforms J-10 in slow speeds? Cool physics! So basically JF-17 outperforms J-10 in most of the parameters for its price. PAF pilots were right afterall.

That's what the Indians claim, which you don't believe anyway. JF-17 is for sure superior to J-10 as per PAF pilots. Also by looks alone JF-17 looks a lot cooler and aggressive looking than J-10. J-10 looks like something the cat dragged in, or in this case the Chinese.

If Pakistani pilots practiced against Block 15, then it means the Chinese pilots too practiced against that don't you think? Where else can they get hold of an F-16.

JF-17 is clearly superior to this J-10. Pakistan is too smart to fall for this trap set by the Chinese. When JF-17 is superior to F-16 as per some Pakistani pilots claims, and if J-10 is equal to F-16 as per Chinese claims, it logically means JF-17 is superior to J-10.

Russians never transferred TVC engines to China. And no Chinese TVC engine copies because no engines to copy from.

He is right. This is not the same news. This was the result of the scheduled Akash test on wednesday. So totally--- # First test successful. (May 24) # Second test failure. (May 26) # Third was of 2 missiles fired back to back, of which 1 was a failure and second one successful. (May 28) #...

WTF? So you don't trust news now? And what's with the assumption that the load carrying capacity in jaguar is because of airframe limitations, and not because of inadequate thrust? If its payload increases with additional thrust then obviously it was a thrust limitation and not airframe...

So totally--- First test successful. Second test failure. Third was of 2 missiles fired back to back, of which 1 was a failure and second one successful. This same IBN website claimed that the second test was a success, while the Hindu claimed it was a failure. Now IBN says "Misfortune struck...

See the OP of this thread for 6 tonnes. That is one of Honeywell's selling points. And what is it with LGBs, as if only one kind of target will present itself in a war. What about anti-personnel cluster bombs, napalms, chemical and biological weapons if the war gets unconventional. You seriously...

And old generation concept which is still used by the Russians and the Americans? Right! And after new engines, the jaguars can carry 6 tonnes of payload. How are you going to compensate this if you replace them now, given the Air-Ground sorties outnumber the Air-Air during the war? From where...

J-20? Seriously, this Obese Fat Box? What are its specs for you to be making these inferences?

baaaaaaasque

Wrong section! Don't contaminate this forum with non-essential news! Someone move it to members club.

-_- Why this kolaveri against Jaguars & Ground Attack fighters? Jaguars may be junks in Air-Air combat, but they are very good as Strike aircrafts. The Basic fact is, the most number of sorties in a war is not Air superiority/patrol sorties, but ground attack! There is a reason why Air...

dudez, where were u all tis tyme? india already selected F-16IN in mmrca, ur PAF lost Air Superiority!

lol dude calm down. You're spamming the forum with yer topics! As far as this BJP vs Congress thing goes, both of their party men should be packed into a furnace and set alight.

Actually the towed targets have huge RCS and big distance separating them, so that the missile doesn't hit the Lakshya by mistake. It's a standard practice to employ huge RCS targets as decoys.