Search results

India was already united country under the Mughal rule in the past but Nepal was not. What was nepal in the past? the first people were Kirat, later came the Indo-Aryan and Dravidian speakers but it was under the Kirat dynasty for 1225 years later came indo-aryan dynasties like the Mallas and...

Nepal is anti-India so don't even try to deny it. 1. You are enrouching on our territory 2. You discriminate against the madhesis. 3. You invaded India and helped British on everything Nepalese are bunch of delusional people. You are claiming territories that have nothing to do with your...

Nepalese were loyal dogs of the British empire, it was them who suppressed the sepoy rebellion and British in return gave you territories that don't belong to you. Your Rana mornachy were pro-british and assisted them in both world wars. You gave them human resources like the Gurkha's in...

The fact is this....... the Madhesis should be given the freedom to their own territories and their own autonomy in nepal.

Nepal had never been colonized but it tried to colonize others. Nepal were invaders and were trying to be a South Asian power. They invaded Northern Indian, Tibet, Sikiim. The Madhesis territories were giving to Nepalese by the british as gesture of friendship but this was against Madhesis...

No it came from Northern Central Asia or Southern Siberia.

Timur was predominately Mongoloid with some caucasoid admixture Kazakhs are 71% Mongoloid with 29% Caucasoid admixture Instanbul Turks are 81 - 95% Caucasoid with 5 - 18.5% Mongoloid admixture There is genetic proof that mix blood to make a person's body stronger and more healthy. The...

Turks are better conquerors while Gurkha are better fighters.

Now the Turks of Central Asia Just like the Gurkha who look from Mongoloid to Caucasoid so do the Turks. Perharps a mixture of two do create the strongest warriors

There is so much similarity between the Turks of central Asia and Gurkhas of Nepal. Both of them are the most famous warriors in military history of Asia. 1. Both are a mixture of Mongoloid and Caucasoid, and both are nomadic warriors. 2. Both are known for bravery and were the toughest...

Actually real Han originated from North/Central China. South Chinese are mixture of Han and ethnic minority but north han also have Mongolian admixture

And here I though that you Chinese always say being Han was just a culture and identity. At least it's better than your brainwashing textbooks from communist

According to wikipedia. Nanyue was forced to be a vassal to Han dynasty in 196BC to 183BC. It's only when Zhao Tuo declared absolute Independence he attacked and sacked some Han territory and kicked the Chinese ***. Many kingdoms started to submit to Nanyue rule and this is when the Han emperor...

The Qing were a very strong people even the empires of Nepal and Afghanistan, Tajiks paid tribute to Qing dynasty. You can really say they were the 2nd greatest empire to have come out from northern Asia after the Mongol Empire. However just look at the Chinese manipulative claims on Mongols...

I'm waiting for a response How do you compare Qing and Nanyue since you claim both are Chinese dynasties?

I find Chinese manipulation and claims extremely bias and self-centered. I've seen a lot argument between Chinese and other people like Koreans/Mongolians who dislike Chinese for claiming Qing dynasty as their own. What amazes me is that some Chinese are trying to insult Indians by saying the...

Actually it is Hong Kong people who think mainland Chinese are parasites. You ask any Hong Kong person and they will tell you this. 1. Hong Kong always make the largest donation to to corrupt communist government when ever there is earthquake 2. Hong Kong companies invested a lot to China 3...

Hong Kong was colonized but the people were not. The people basically rushed in and were invited by the British to help build all the architecture in city as construction workers and eventually needed to live under British rules and laws, they could have leave anytime they wanted to but they...

If KMT was the one who won HK wouldn't have any of these problems today I prefer Cantonese to Mandarin, I find Mandarin sound ugly to be honest How would you know they wouldn't have the guts to demand HK back? Cantonese and Mandarin are both ugly but so are all Chinese dialects I've heard.

If KMT was the one who won HK wouldn't have any of these problems today. I prefer Cantonese to Mandarin, I find Mandarin sound ugly to be honest.