Search results

Dardic people can easily related with East Iranic in terms of physical appearance and autosomal DNA . Their language classification Indo-European Indo-Iranian Indo-Aryan

It's incorrect to even call it China and anyone who read history will realize it was never China. It's only part of China due to conquest and nothing more. Again it's not China and NEVER HAD BEEN CHINA. Even the historical ethnic groups that lived next to those Indo-Europeans and later...

Here's a map of ingenious linguistic families. They don't seem to belong to the Dardic language family but are Indo-Europeans aswell. Only the blue part is considered Indo-European. They speak a language similar to Tajiks but I have no idea if their original language was related with Tajiks or...

I haven't seen anyone talk about this but there's a ethnic group in China's Xinjiang called " Pamiri " and physically they look 100% just like the ethnic Kalash, Hunza who live in Indian's/Pakistan Kashmir. It's hard to be believe they don't belong to the same origin considering their close...

It was indeed north to south. I never said they came from the south to north.

You can read about the history of Southern Thailand and Malaysia. They are indigenous people of Southern Southeast Asia and the Southeast Asian today have a degree of DNA from these people. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Malaysia Here is a prehistoric demographic of Malaysia...

That depends. They are always more dominant if they over 50% Mongoloid, I've seen many mixed breeds genetic results. Once they have 55-58% South Asian DNA and only 42-45% Mongoloid; 90% of the time they end looking much more Indian. No, they are aboriginals of Southeast Asia. The...

Well Southeast Asians are a mixture of Mongoloid, Negrito, South Asian but their Mongoloid DNA predominates. Like original people of Nepal, Bhutan, Northeast India used to belong to dark skinned indegenious populations so did the southern parts of Southeast Asia. Negrito mtDNA M21a is...

You could be right about that. One can call them Veddoid racial type which exist only in India. or maybe they are just very dark skin Caucasian They are a sub-group of Tibetan racial group called Tibeto-Burmese but they are not Tibetan. Some Nepalese are descendants of Tibetan invaders or...

Yes, Indian race is Caucasian but there are racial groups that would be considered australoids like the people in these pictures. The original people of Nepal, Northeast India belong to Australoid. Mongoloid Nepalese migrated to Northern Nepal and lived strictly in Northern Nepal. The origin...

They would say the same thing to Kazakhs. Genetically Kazakhs are only 70% Mongoloid/30% Caucasoid but because their predominate Mongoloid it can result in overall Mongoloid appearance. Even with eye color, hair color almost all of them have pure Mongoloid/or very predominate Mongoloid...

Burmese are genetically 88% Mongoloid and 11% South Asian. Northeast Indians have 3x the South Asian admixture that Burmese have. There many Uyghurs in Southern Xinjiang's China look Caucasoid or almost pure Caucasoid but doesn't mean Uyghurs are pure racially Caucasoid, many of them just...

1) There is no such thing as genetically and racially pure Mongoloids in South Asia unless he is a ethnic Chinese or East Asian. Mongoloids do not exist in South Asia only Mongoloid looking South Asians. 2) Mongoloid were never native to South Asia. The lands that the Mongoloids in South Asia...

Nonsense, every DNA shows there's no such thing as pure Mongoloid Nepalese. Most Nepalese populations belong to South Asian Caucasoid caste and heavily mixed looking cast. Simply read wikipedia and demographic data, it always shows Mongoloid Nepalese ins a minority percentage. A Mongoloid...

http://www.rfa.org/english/news/myanmar/rohingya-bangladesh-01192017181052.html Interviews: One in Three Rohingya Women Refugees Say They Were Raped One in three women interviewed by BenarNews this week in Bangladesh’s refugee camps for Rohingya Muslims who fled violence in Myanmar claimed...

I can't believed this wasn't posted before in this forum which is far more important than most of news https://www.youthkiawaaz.com/2017/08/shrinking-spaces-for-rohingyas-in-india/ "Then, there is the report by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), based...

Keep telling myself what ? The fact is Arakan region was never invaded by foreign invaders in the last 5000 years with exception. If there is Mongoloid looking Rohingya they are properly descended from Japs " Imperial Japanese forces slaughtered, raped, and tortured Rohingya Muslims and Indian...

It's already been proven that the Aryan invasion is a myth and there is no evidence of any genetic blending of people from Central Asia, Middle east, European with the people South Asia in last thousands of years. Rohingya have lived in Arakan properly even since 3000 BC and never experienced...

This is a lie, Rohingya are the purest Indo-Aryan groups there is. There is no evidence of them intermarrying with the Burmese or having Mongoloid features. Even if there was some mixing with the mongoloid the Rohingya phenotypes are clearly 100% Indo-Aryan which are clearly demonstrated in...

What is so absurd ? A lot of idiots like to claim Indians with blue eyes, green eyes are either the result of Scythian, Indo-Sythian ancestry, Kushan ancestry, greek ancestry, Iranian, Sassanids ancestry that assimilated into India however their genetic contribution is very few to India. I mean...