Search results

Then Hakkas are president in many countries. They were the first president of China, Taiwan and Singapore, also prime minister in Thailand, Burma they were also the first president in Guyana. The Cantonese have large significant cultural and linguistic influence due to HK entertainment like...

H Mao zedong was also a founder. However no person from India can deny that only 2 groups founded what is today modern India. Basically Brahmin was the highest class, the top seed of the country while the Gujarati was a striving cultural force that led it to happen. You also can't deny that...

Exactly and he is from the Brahmin group. Too many people are forgetting what our ancestors did. The Brahmin, Punjabis, Tamils, Gujarati, Bengalis are the most successful groups in India.

And do you know who this man is?

Who is he? Brahmin is what made modern Indian history although the Gujarati have contributed significantly cultural independence to India even Gandhi was from Gujarati. The father of modern China was Sun Yat sen a Hakka or a Hakka-Cantonese. If it weren't for him it wouldn't have succeeded...

My father is from the Brahmin although my mother is a mixture of Brahmin and high caste Tamil nadu Brahmin descent, so both side of my heritage are superior. The first prime minister of India was Brahmin and the people who let made the India independent movement successful was also Brahmin...

Without the great Hakka leader Sun Yat sen there will be no new founding of modern China.And without the Cantonese revolution, finance and without Hong Kong there would never be such thing in the first place. Does anyone agree? Without them no modern china no xinhai revolution. Chinese will...

That is why I say north Chinese have heavy siberian DNA

However the Chinese with O2b came from the Manchus, Jin

I doubt it, it's historically in places where the Manchus were had been but it has been detected in some samples of Han Chinese from Beijing (Jin 2003),Xi'an (1/34, Kim 2011), Jiangsu (Lu 2008), Wuhan (1/160),[1] and South China outside of Jiangsu, Anhui, Zhejiang, and Shanghai (1/65) It's...

Than there is O2b1 and O2b too which is around 1.5 to 3%

Umm..... what is there to be surprised? you can do the same to any language wikipedia. Just click on " translate this page " and you can read it زبان پنجابی - ویکی‌پدیا، دانشنامهٔ آزاد

You wish it did but the truth is Liaoning han have 22.5% C3 and The frequency of Haplogroup C-M217 in samples of Han Chinese from various areas has ranged from 0% (0/27 Han from Guangxi) to 23.5% (8/34 Han from Xi'an[14]), with the frequency of this haplogroup in several studies' pools of all...

Yes I did, how else would I know what the heck was written? it's very easy to do. And no, every Malaysian have Indian blood but from 5-20%

You obviously a big fool if you think Y-DNA Mongolian (properly also from Xianbei, Jin dynasty, Khitan) C3 which reaches 6 -22.5% in North Chinese have no influence or mtDNA mongolians, Jin dynasty, Xianbei

That is what it says when I used google translator to edit the wikipedia in English. Although Malaysians are genetically are genetically Southeast Asian race they also have 10-20% Indian/South Asian blood from both maternal and paternal.

I didn't edit shit, there was a argument between Hong Kong people and Chinese on another forum so I went to check it out. Than there was this argument between Cantonese vs Mandarin, both of them talk of themselves as if they were distinct races. So I went to check it and found out it says...

South Chinese are mixture of North Han and Southern ethnic minorities. Cantonese are basically no different to Southern Chinese in the same way Southern Indians from India all have heavy North Indian admixture from paternal lines ( aside from the low caste )

Exactly they are different. However why do you suppose their is 3x to 6x more Siberian component in North Chinese than SOUTH?

You know what I find funny is that even your own Chinese wiki editted that Cantonese are malaysians or baiyue not han ------> 廣府民系 - 维基百科，自由的百科全书