A perfect example is Afg and Pak Border...The US have deployed drones with much more sensitive equipment...it still didn't help at many occasions. Mountainous terrain are the most difficult and drones might not work all the time...
Many of Idoits here dont know even the abc's of these CM's and what purpose they are for and how complicated these technologies are....Just look at how Raad dive's in Terrain hugging mode, regain's stability... heck even see the shadow on the ground... Travelling at 0.7-0.8 Mach it will just...
What debunks WS-13 for ''PAF Thunders'' is that the officials have time again and again stated that they are so very much satisfied with RD-93 reliability and also that it provides ''ample power''. We have ordered hundred's of RD-93's...So what makes you think that we need WS-13...
Hi,
It seems like
1. This JF-17 is more likely to be block 2 for a foreign (unknown) customer.
2. CAC maybe taking off pressure from PAC with its block 2 production lines for PAF...
3. WS-13 theory seems far fetched...I am more inclined towards point 2...
There is no plane in US arsenal which will replace or has the capabilities of A-10...F-35 i doubt can provide the role as that of A-10...Man its a beauty and beast in one package...
I hope we do every thing to get hands on these babies....M 2000-9 in hands of PAF's pilots....They will be damn lethal and quite a headache for our neighbour...
I 100% agree to what you've said...On one side you're droning in Pakistan( Lets keep aside the topic ''innocent / terrorist dead'' by droning)...Is that a good image US is trying to portray of Pakistan...and you want to neutralize the drone effects by this pitty video...
Yes Dear...I am very much aware of this concept...But sorry it sucks...You want to improve relation with a country by giving a 1 min idiotic video in which a bunch of people are forced to gulp down an alien stuff(which is not THAT good either)...maybe making up for the kerry donuts which... but...