concerning burn bridges ... they were never the right bridges to begin with. besides the army has ruled with these "bridges" tell me how successful they were
in any case I personally dont that was the reason. The real reason was Khan was taking power and fame away from the army.
how?
by doing...
he did what he believed was in the best interest of Pakistan.. and in academic terms I to believed he was and still is correct. and well that is why we love him .... he is not a typical cutter cookie south asian leader.
He does the impossible.. if you look at his history he always defied odds...
I think you are confused with not satisfied with being unpopular.. while most of khan's backers ie general population were not happy with his governance (ie Usman Buzdar being on top) it by no means they liked Nawaz
you are analysis is as erroneous as the army
Nope..
The noon league massive during defeat on by elections post Khans ousting proved they never had any real support . This was despite massive cheating by noonies
Correct
The army just happy playing the client state for US, KSA or China .. hence it is famous title “double game”. The...
Altaf bhai .. all was good when army was backing you .. ie all the criminals activities you did
Remember cartoon the army created you in Karachi to fight PPP
May be he is hendooo bendooo trying to convert?..
He must believed Rana lectures.. ie how to become a Muslim
https://www.thenews.com.pk/amp/341607-welcoming-nawaz-greater-deed-than-haj-rana-sana
depends what you mean by innocent ?
Settlers ?...
Civilians?
most them are IDF or IDF trained.. hardly innoccent
just bcos Hamas caught them when their pants were down.. literally.. doesn't make them so
Why is it that non-Muslim Bengalis, Biharis, UPis, Punjabis, and Sindhis can coexist harmoniously, but when the Hindus are in power conflicts and violence among them often arise?