Search results

Bihar ke ta kai log bate.... Lekin bhojpuri bole wala iha bahute jayda badan khaskar UP ke

Siwan ta bagale me bate .... Aawa ghumat ghamat .. Litti chokha lagi ...

Mine is in Muhammadabad area. by the way I have spent lots of days in Reotipur. 'Kul bhojpuri bole wala logan ke namskar'

Kuch aur kam nahi hai Kya karne ko ....

I am also from Ghazipur. By the way from which village you are?

Are you imported? What's so hard to pronounce in these.. If you have read hindi in schools, there is nothing to be afraid of.

Yes I am from UP. Are you too?

Roy, I would like to correct you. Patana was never called Awadh or Oudh. It was the region of Lucknow-Faizabad-Gorakhapur.

Almost every north Indian can pronounce it smoothly because these are more or less hindi/sanskrit words. The changes above you said are not going to take place in near future because there is no demand from public. Allahabad will remain Allahabad Patana will remain Patana Delhi may be...

I don't know about other cities but as far as varansi is concerned , It is called Varansi in pure pronunciation but local used to say it as Banaras so both names are valid like 'Banaras Hindu University' . british called it as Benaras instead of Banaras. Also Kanpur was called Cawnpor in...

we will not take advice.... Now what?

Second one is AMCA

oh good .... Then what is proof that PNS Meharan was not a DRAMA .... Any proof.... Remember proof Now this is like ' thook kar chatana...'

Why dont your authorities come with something reliable first of all !!! Your highly reliable source is not even worth of peanuts...... Sometimes you claim that Iran is with India and against Pakistan.... Now your highly reliable source is telling that Indian gameplan is against Iran....?

Sare aate hain Pakistan me..... Star ,Zee , Sony aur bhi bahut sare...

No sir, In case of IP addresses it is going to be true....

NAT was created just as a short term solution for IPv4 depletion in mid 90s...It is just as good as bad. With NAT you just a THIN CLIENT on web..nothing more.... Believe me there is much storng security embedded in IPv6:cheers:

4.1 billion is only theoretical limit ... in actual practice it is much less than that............ IPv6 is yet to be deployed fully by all ISPs... lets see when it happens:coffee: