Search results

i feel a sudden wave of neutrality sweeping over. turns out that I feel neutral to them attacking pakistan.

yes

one must thank them for keeping our spirits high in these dark days.

man's in jail. must be innocent then. given the state of justice in this country.

a day. but for that to happen, Pakistan must acquire hypersonic weapons and these weapons must have the range, precision and firepower to take out India's nuclear arsenal in a first strike. (easier said then done, and the Indians could achieve this as well) the unconditional surrender would...

knowing the army, it will bleat for peace talks with india, and call it an accident, even when the invasion is happening.

Sheikh Imran Hossein makes several interesting points, especially with Yajuj and Majuj present in western civilization, but how on earth could Vladimir Putin possibly be Dhul Qarnain lol.

we need an "Auspicious Incident" get the artillery ready.

europe likes sanctioning but doesnt like getting sanctioned. who knew?

Yes, we lack the logistical muscle to deploy more than a 100 km from the border . but that is a consequence from employing a defensive doctrine that has been used since 1971. the whole 1000 cuts policy comes to mind. investing in logistics and supply will only happen when the people at the top...

we were bankrupt in 48. didnt stop Jinnah from going to war to save Kashmir. dont bring up the economy as an excuse, it will always be bad, and partly due to our resources going to fund our military which of course we will not use even under ballistic missile fire.

this NUCLEAR STATE did nothing when a ballistic missile was launched at it. so i would tone down my expectations.

which is why logic dictates Pakistan use a offensive doctrine to exploit advantages gained in the early stages of war. which is why a defensive doctrine is defeatism. allowing them the luxury of mobilizing and giving them first mover advantage is stupid. the lack of geographical barriers...

is this an april fools thing?

the US can have natural gas reserves for a 1000 years. transporting that gas to Europe to meet daily needs and getting at an affordable cost is completely different story altogether. you require LNG infrastructure to meet it. at the moment Europe requires 85 million tonnes, but US and Qatar can...

you keep missing my point, the whole point that i was originally making, and then you just go on a side quest rather than addressing the main point. that Greece didnt get its independence in 1821. You cant even call it a revolution. it merely traded masters, from Ottoman to a German Catholic...

when faced with a bunch of terrible options, such as the Marathas, and the Sikhs, allying, or being a British Protectorate might seemed like a better option. Not an optimal one, that is true, but Britain conquered the region with the help of native soldiers for a reason. Surely you Greeks could...

loved Greece? a Catholic King loving an Orthodox people? Such a good king that he got exiled? If he loved Greece, surely, the least he could have done was to become Orthodox, the only thing he loved was taxing Greece to the max. do not put British rule and Hindtva Occupation in the same...

its a funny revolution if you ask me. the greeks went from being under the Ottoman Monarchy to under a Bavarian Prince, a compromise candidate , chosen by the British and the Russians. Yet it is seen as an "independent" nation, which is pretty funny to think of. Also the fledgeling nation was...

nah. they can keep that pile of trash to themselves.