Search results

He makes several assumptions. 1. Indian Muslims supported the oppressive Indian state against fellow Muslims in Kashmir 2. Indian Muslims continue to do so. HOW THE F did he know???

Muslims will not NEED protection if the majority stops hating them. Treat the source. Please.

We prefer to be victors. Not victims.

This is India's declaration of war on Muslims. The Hindu and Sikh refugees have the entire India to resettle. Why Kashmir? If they choose to stay on, they are complicit in the crimes against Muslims. Exactly. @Joe Shearer You are spot on here. Same as I said. @xeuss - Another step closer to...

Scratch a Hindu liberal and a Sanghi comes out...

How would Europe had been if the Battle of Vienna was won? What do you think?

That is inevitable. Perhaps you mistook me for an idealist. I wish for every land ruled by the Sanghis to be liberated. But I know that will not happen in the current situation. Even with Pokkhos hating Biharis, and Marwaris - they will still have a hatred for muslims and Islam. Because it is...

Yeah. He said so too. He was 'non practicing There are (unfortunately) people like them in India. Prayer is a fard. Stick to your previous story please. :D 'Non practicing'.

I wish the Turks knew what was at stake. It turned out to be a Stalingrad instead. Had it been successful, Europe would have looked very different.

Not a fan of the Taliban, but when facing Sanghis, anything is justified.

Bangla Pokkho is not going to clean house. If they do, they will remove Muslims. Not Hindus. It is a nationalistic movement. Bengali nationalism gave birth to modern Indian and Hindu nationalism. In any case, nationalism will not work with Islam. They are virulently against Urdu as well. They...

Bangla Pokkho is not the best allied organisation. It is itself infested with Sanghis. They too are against Muslims. There must be other organisations working on the ground.

Wow, you know everybuddy!!!

Ok. Yeah, I have a partial affinity to what you are trying to say. The Muslim community stays stronger if partition did not happen. I agree. No name change would be possible, building all these historical 'temples' and associated masjid demolitions also seem unlikely. Especially with a...

No. Parition India so that communal animosity is diminished and genocides are averted.

Check what Arya Samaj did. Check the RSS history in Lahore. I doubt this. Say what you want, but they do have something. It is not possible to continue in this day and age otherwise.

You are doing a better job - no doubt about that.

Yes. I mean, are you blaming Muslims THEN for having a role? You do understand that they had no choice... And in retrospect, they are vindicated.

The Sangh is a symptom of a greater malaise. Call it the historical baggage, Hindu religion or whatever - as long as it remains, there will not be peace. Without Hindu-ism there wont be any Hindutva. Lahore was a Sanghi hotbed in the 1920s. Is it today?

@Naofumi I hope you are not blaming Muslims for the Partition...