I meant that, does he take adjutant's tank?
But that isn't much effective, as during the charge by the Guides cavalry, they suffered so many casualties because the FOO lacked armour protection and hence he couldn't coordinate fire effectively. As a result guides ran into enemy tanks that had...
@PanzerKiel
FOOs liaison with units only during wartime?
Also in case he is providing support to an armd regt, he gets into a tank right? So is that tank part of a sqn?
I thought by motorisation you meant trucks not HMMWVs. For motorisation of Inf would require 12000+ armoured vehs and I have not included V, X corps and indp bdes.
Most of our SIBs are deployed with Central and Northern commands. There they will take up pre planned defensive positions based on...
What would be the benefit of this?
We already have S&T coys for transporting inf bns. Adding a truck coy to an SIB would only increase the load on the CO. He would then be performing the dual roles of CO of an inf bn as well as S&T. It would become hectic especially when it would come to maint...
You think they can absorb what you are implying? No.
Our perspective is fixed.
Each div having a LAT or a HAT plus atleast an armoured bde (some having multiple), the numerous IABGs/IMBGs, upgrades of Type85 and 59, AK1, overhauling of T80, VT4, M109s... All of these providing the PA with a...