Search results

Again a quote from a 2001 article.Has anything changed in Pak in last 8 years or not?. If change then stop quoting from 8 year old article, Will you???.

Surgical strikes are feasible militarily: Army chief Press Trust of India Sunday, February 08, 2009 10:47 AM (New Delhi) Against the backdrop of much-debated option of surgical strikes against terror infrastructure in Pakistan post-Mumbai terror attack, Army chief General Deepak Kapoor has...

No Lockheed, Boeing, Sukhoi, MiG, Dassault etc are not making their aircrafts from scratch, but from technology they have gained by designing AC over decades.For ex. F-22 raptor stealth technology was gained through F-117 Nighthawk ,which is designed for stealth only and is incapable in a dog...

He is a very good hitter, aint he??? I still remember his 100 against AUS in ENG in which Aus lost to BAN.

I also acknowledged that for "the functionality it offers, the price of the JF-17 is almost too good to be true".Read my previous post. post #14 Do what you can but china wont upgrade JF17 upto J10 level even with upgrades.And JF17 is for interception mainly i.e. denying air space to enemy...

Man you are under dellusions as Indian Govt. have neither admitted failure of missile tech. nor are they.Indian missile technology is indeed very sucessfull with most of the envisaged missiles completed and will be soon inducted into Army and are under user trials.By 2013 User trials of Agni III...

It matters because it is licensed produced in China and to sell that to any other country they have to seek Russia's permission.

But in articles on wikipedia where it has references to prove what is written in it are somewhat reliable.

Link means Email link. That is what I have said.If china has to sold it, it should have it's own engine not RD 33 DERIVATIVE. Now read this from post. This puts the credibility of article into jeopardize. In whose world??? Pakistan's world.The statement is immature. Nope. j-10 is going to...

EL/M-2052 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Read this and TEJAS IS ANOTHER NAME OF LCA.Besides your link leads to no place which says that only 10 targets can be managed.Try your Link.

By those who put a 2001 article without mentioning date and then say that no LCA components will be indegenous.Just put it this way lets agree to disagree on who is better B/W LCA and JF17.

Man you cant even read wikipedia correctly.The radar to be used in LCA is EL/M-2052 AESA which can manage 64 targets.

You have just put one liners and not facts.Beside I am not saying that I know all.The point is if you want to argue put some facts to bolster it.

Planning for LCA block II have already started and I dont think except from some french equipments and may be a new engine derivative anything is going to change as China also wants Pak to order more J-10.

Hey Lockheed F16 by now I know you are not aware of even JF17 forget about LCA.

All these things have been already discussed so please dont make it LCA VS JF17 THREAD.

First of all no links provided. Second Jf-17 uses RD93 A DERIVATIVE OF RD 33 which China license produce so sale to any other country requires permission of Russia and if russia deemed that it affecting their market they will refuse.So unless China develops engine on it's own it is unlikely to...

Someone here said that Jf-17 will be made from scratch in Pakistan and china will hand over them all the technology except may be engine and some of french equipments.Is that true??? Second thing LCA will have all it's equipments available easily too so how can they say JF-17 will be better in...

JF-17 Thunder - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Now this sums up that jf-17 is able to retain it's main purpose.Lca on the other hand is an advanced interceptor to replace Mig-21.

“an edge over its contemporary aircraft, particularly the Indian Light Combat Aircraft in terms of cost, early availability and supportability" So Pak officials now evaluate an AC on basis of cost,early availability and supportability.Even in these criteria JF-17 is good only in early...