Search results

Modi has made Gujarat the fastest growing state in India. There is no proof he had anything to do with the riot. http://dailypioneer.com/200856/%E2%80%98Communal%E2%80%99-Modi-spent-more-on-Muslim-welfare.html There is no proof that India has anything to do with insurgencies in Pakistan, while...

India throws its influence around for legitimate reasons. Never started wars: India. Thank you. Because Indians and humans in general are usually competitive. A cold war will be good for the development of India. Politicians will fast forward projects so we don't look bad in front of China...

No, for our long terms needs, we should continue with missile development. Perhaps focusing on miniaturisation of the missiles, making them road mobile etc.

You forgot to mention that our economy is 10 times larger than yours. By that regard the US should spend only 8 billion on its military same with China.

Yes I would believe they had the ability. Given they had the political willpower to spend the funds.

What the hell? Are we seriously talking about India invading Taiwan. Our ships are FARRRRRRR from inferior. The US sells weapons to India as well, what's your point. This is turning into a pissing competition.

A test is simply validation. I agree Indian ASAT technology isn't validated, but to say that the country doesn't have the ability is wrong. I don't think we have a rogue satellite to kill anyway.

What the ****? <facepalm> Every day of browsing this forum makes me more depressed. India is going to be resigned to having delusional and sometimes downright stupid neighbours.

Well please explain for this low-IQ Indian. Or does low-IQ even need to be mentioned when we're talking about Indians?

Yes I think you have done it. You have lost me. Nobel Laureates from India/Indian origin: 13 + So many people like Bose/Gandhi etc, who should have received the Prize but for some reason, didn't Nobel Laureates from China/Chinese origin: 9

I doubt one 'guy' developed the LCA or Arjun. I am very technically sound, thank you very much.

Agreed, simulation will never be as comprehensive as the real thing however, an ASAT is a strategic weapon, just the threat that it MIGHT succeed is enough.

Mine had a small webcam on it that transferred live footage to the control center on my laptop. Actually a mate from school and I did this together. Trying to find pictures now.

YES WE DO HAVE ASAT :)

**** knows, all I said was he was comparing the PAC III to the AAD system. And he said the AAD was superior. The AAD might be able to engage targets at the 15km flight ceiling of the PAC3? Presumably he was comparing the performance at the same altitude. Anyway I didn't read the whole thing...

Are you crazy? POTENTIAL ENERGY INCREASES WITH HEIGHT. ACCELERATION DUE TO GRAVITY DOES NOT. <facepalm> What are you 12? Also the notation for Potential energy is Ep not P. P is momentum.

Hey look at me I'm Indian therefore, I have an IQ of 81. If nothing else perhaps the IQ of Chinese is firmly stuck on 100 with not one person over that number. At least that is what this forum has demonstrated. If Indians have people with an IQ of 81, we also have people with genius level...

I made a small drone a la a helicopter in year 12 when I was 16. It could carry a 8kg payload to a height of 8 metres. Though it did weigh 23kg IIRC

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL The Laws of Physics says acceleration due to gravity DECREASES WITH ALTITUDE.

He says our ABM is better than the PAC 3. I believe him. Why do you think that: Longer range = Better missile technology It's not the case, accuracy is far harder to develop.