Search results

Even if he wins in court the U.S. won't give two shits.

He is wanted by the U.S. for a reason.....and it's not because he is a saint.

As far as I can see they are saying the same as everyone else, which is that it gives India a strong strategic boost. If you can provide me with a source/link saying otherwise from a credible expert, I will gladly look at it. India's Agni V- 5,000km range (Your best friend China says it...

Considering the Pakistani forces were sitting on the higher ground and lost JUST 74 less men then us is embarrassing if you ask me for Pakistan's military. Yes, you wounded a lot more of India's soldiers because you had the advantage of attacking an enemy coming at you from a decline position...

I said "will" not "are" or "have".

I have no idea who crossed the LOC first. Me and you were not there my friend. As for Kargil, are you referring to India sending troops after detecting the intruders or way before when there was an understanding that there would be no troops in Kashmir from both sides?

Pakistan improved. Top 4 still the same.

Most people will believe India regardless of what happened. Pakistan was condemned globally for Kargil and made to look like frequent intruders. It's not right but it is reality. Only those who were there know what really happened.

Congrats to Pakistan. Awesome news for them.

You only have more. India's delivery systems are far better. Don't forget how all the Pak Generals shitted themselves when India test fired Agni V. I was speaking of a conventional war anyways. But India defeated Pakistan in Kargil and '71. The most recent conflicts. My sister's best...

Um...then why did LTTE target Indian leaders?

India- Liberated Bangladesh and has always maintained good relations with other nations. Pakistan- Killed 3,000,000 Bengali people, houses several wanted militants, and was probably protecting OBL. Don't talk about respect.

Pakistan cannot win a war against India. People need to realize this, and deal with reality.

The U.S. had 30,000 warheads during the peak of the Cold War, they have downsized to around 5,000-9,000 now. Nuclear weapons are just a no-no in my IMO. They are far too destructive and yield to far too much collateral damage. Almost 95% civilian. Nuclear weapons armament is the most disgraceful...

Pakistan has produced several respectable, and honorable leaders like Bhutto, who I would trust with nuclear weapons. The common argument placed forth is that those weapons might fall into the hands of a OBL like individual. If anyone wants to disarm Pakistan, they should want to disarm India as...

Russia has always been more supportive of India. It is good to see the US and India coming together recently and preforming military exercises. I can actually see India playing a role of deterrence in any possible future conflicts between Russia and US.

This is good to hear. Mullah Omar needs to be reached and communicated with in order for this to happen. The thing is these high ranking militants are so afraid to come out because they know our Drones are everywhere looking for them.

I disagree. India is completely capable of giving China a good fight, I seriously doubt China would win easily, considering India can now deliver explosive ordinances to all parts of China.

Because the OBL raid was not a war act? It was a single operation in a ten year long war. What Pakistanisage said is correct.

You wanna give Pakistan all of Northeast Afghanistan? Do you realize how many of our troops died fighting to take it and keep it?