Not up in arms - simply pointing out to you that your consistent use of media-indoctrinated meaningless buzzwords exposes you for what you are.
Incidentally, "stone age barbarians" ceased to exist after the stone ages. Anyone attacking an embassy is committing a crime at worst and/or a...
By the same token, shouldn't you have read the thread title too before you derailed the thread by taking the unnecessary potshot at the "stone age barbarians"?
Not at all - read my reply again carefully. I made it clear that I wasn't defending the actions of those involved. Not only do you lack any ability to write properly, but it appears that you lack the ability to read as well.
Only hatemongers resort to using media-indoctrinated buzzwords such as "stone-age" and "barbarians".
Here's a list of attacks on diplomatic missions:
List of attacks on diplomatic missions - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I am not defending the actions of those involved, but, to use your...
As Jessica_L has pointed out, this is completely off-topic. Nevertheless, since you have chosen to reinterpret history for maximal propagandist effect and accuse the Prophet of “slaughter”, it merits a response.
Even an oft-compromised source such as Wikipedia recounts what exactly...
It is clear that more than one interpretation of who are the khawarij is relevant in today's context. (They are mentioned in detail in Chapters 13 and 14 of the book whose reference I gave.)
Well stated!
The khawarij were defined at the time of the Prophet himself, so the same definition applies today. The scholarly interpretations I mentioned can be found in much greater detail in the book at this reference, which compiles in one place a whole list of classical interpretations about them as...
That's a fantastically superficial reading of the geopolitical realities behind these conflicts - in reality the khawarij are fighting Muslims in Pakistan, Syria, Libya, and the khawarij are (according to scholarly interpretation of various ahadith) already outside the fold of Islam.
Lack of...
Your entire focus seems to be to derail this thread, which was about Iran's Tokamak reactor. I will state this one last time - there is a thread elsewhere about Pakistan's nuclear submarine development (link provided earlier), and if you want to indulge in the Indian fantasy that Pakistan in...
See the part in red? Congratulations - you have just shot yourself in the foot. Pakistan's nuclear programs (weapons and submarine) are not commercial efforts.
As you say, don't draw a parallel where there is none.
PS: Good luck with trying to uncover Pakistan's nuclear secrets on Google...
There's a 55-page thread about this already here:
http://www.defence.pk/forums/pakistan-navy/191237-pakistans-nuclear-submarine-development-news-discussions.html
It is riddled with Indian trolls insisting the very same thing as yourself. I won't take your bait and derail this thread by...
Pakistan is already building one:
Pakistani Navy to Develop Nuclear-Powered Submarines: Reports | Defense News | defensenews.com
In an ideal situation, both Iran and Pakistan would be building one together!
Relax, bro - I am NOT disagreeing with you. I simply wanted to highlight the fact that there is another facet to this, which DOES involve co-operation amongst scientists internationally. And yes, you are right - the VoA piece does raise credibility issues about the original news item, however...
Amusing :)
The news was widely reported at the time of the announcement in 2012. Here are some links, including a copy of a purported signed agreement between Azad University and Lawrenceville Plasma Physics:
Iran's Islamic Azad University Is Working With New Jersey Company Plasma Physics...
Thank you (and Soheil) for mentioning this.
So many non-Muslims (as well as some secularized Muslims) want to see Muslims divided, and as we see in the world today, they are succeeding. Neither Iran nor Pakistan can ever be enemies, as it would be suicidal for us both.
Fortunately, the...
Yes it is a disease - but please read his post again. The advice on keeping quiet about nuclear achievements, for Iran at least, appears genuine and sincere.
Equally, you have a valid point in that Iran's tokamak program is already not secret; since Iran is also collaborating internationally...