Search results

So by same logic it should not concern you if we trade Kashmir for Tibet. And for your info that agre,ment was signed by Zulfikar Bhutto and it's ample proof for any thinking brain to come to conclusion.

Since you bothered quoting me in this thread let's discuss it to it's conclusion. Your country didn't control 68% of Kashmir but still laid claim to whole Kashmir. You see you can't have liberty to do cherypicking here to your advantage , if you want to go with the argument of Armstrong...

I or for that matter even IK as a Afghani wou'd have appealed for exactly the same if one was in his shoes. No surprises here.

I thought Chinese members had high IQ and they understand strategic games but thanks for correcting me.

I thought you laid claim to whole Kashmir but never mind. Today you don't administer IOK (as you guys like to put it) then would you mind if India trades Kashmir for Tibet ???

For that we already have listening port in Oman but yes new port will only enhance our capabilities.

I appreciate your lack of info on this matter.

We are more prepared than ever for that.Only yesterday I heard 2 billion$ were allocated to our para military forces.It won't be surprising if BSF along LoC and CRPF consumes big chunk of that budget.

We are at least putting up a fight unlike your country which ceded more than 5000sq kms.without even making Chinese loose their single bullet, bravo.

Title is misleading , it' more of a counter to Pakistan since it will remove Afghanistan's dependency on Pak for connecting her to outside world not bordering her.

As always Di ck measuring contest is on. I don't know why people are dragging Pakistan and host of other countries in thread concerning India.