What's new

Indo-Israeli Nexus Sabotages World Peace

Status
Not open for further replies.
if you remember when pakistan and india got sperate it was mulim majority vs hindu majority ...kashmir was muslim majority not hindu but the ruler of the state was hindu soo he gave kashmir to india which was wrong ... soo in the future i hope to see kashmir in future independant or with pakistan .... not with bias india

if u r speculating on religion basis then rightfull owner is INDIA

tell u wy amarnath,ganges etc are prominent temples

and many hindus ,mongoloids,sikhs were killed,many left the place
 
Last edited:
well if only if its an indian problem, why not solve it?
or tell me who is not letting you to a solution?


we will solve it by gods grace

pakistan is not letting us to solve it
 
oh yes gods grace it takes a really long time to make a decision for the gods .... they all have to vote and discuss when innocent people dieing ...
 
oh yes gods grace it takes a really long time to make a decision for the gods .... they all have to vote and discuss when innocent people dieing ...

its terrorist sent by pakistanis are dying
 
for real!!! wow that why every year people are treated like dirt raped and what not! but throught the eyes of an indian it justice ... petty
 
for real!!! wow that why every year people are treated like dirt raped and what not! but throught the eyes of an indian it justice ... petty

don talk of justice to me(justice died long ago in this world),give justice to baloch first

go check out the sophian case and the real culprits
 
if you remember when pakistan and india got sperate it was mulim majority vs hindu majority ...kashmir was muslim majority not hindu but the ruler of the state was hindu soo he gave kashmir to india which was wrong ... soo in the future i hope to see kashmir in future independant or with pakistan .... not with bias india

U have the wrong information.The last Viceroy of India had made it clear that a ruler can stay independent from both India and Pakistan if he wishes.The king of jammu wanted to remain independent,but after tribes from the NWFP attacked his kingdom he decided to join India.
 
last picture was great .... that all i got to say .... and your sateing that india is not isreal LOLLL .. over here in canada we reckon that kashmir and plastine are occupied states .., soo its best that you can STFU... i mean how the hell can you say kashmir is a part of india ??? all muslims over there!! people who live there are abducted by indian army everyone knows it .... but still kashmir belongs to india ... my ***

MTT - Occupied Kashmir - One Indian Army Soldier sent to hell by Mujahadeen e Kashmir

The moderators are quite active these days, can they please help curb such insulting language and abuse. A defence forum should not allow insulting dead soldiers, its disgusting.
 
U have the wrong information.The last Viceroy of India had made it clear that a ruler can stay independent from both India and Pakistan if he wishes.The king of jammu wanted to remain independent,but after tribes from the NWFP attacked his kingdom he decided to join India.

he decided to join india eh? so what about the people ? they dead. they had no freedome to say anything. this is india
 
don talk of justice to me(justice died long ago in this world),give justice to baloch first

go check out the sophian case and the real culprits

so that girl got what she wanted ? she went to america and went down in history for women rights but on the other hand dont make me wanna tell indian rights to its women LOOOOL ... u know what i mean
 
he decided to join india eh? so what about the people ? they dead they had no freedome to say anything this is india

Why did pakistan attack in the first place??If the attack had not occured then Kashmir would have been a free country now.
 
and for any one who says balochistan is not pakistan GET A LIFE ..... i have family in balochistan in dharrah region... they love pakistan the will die for pakistan and gave anything for pakistan .... the soo called balochistan rebles lol they just want money and wealth from balochistan that it.... without the wealth this land has to offer it would just be a place where opium would grow
 
he decided to join india eh? so what about the people ? they dead. they had no freedome to say anything. this is india

Who said kashmiris have no freedom.Don't u see the huge protests in the valley where people shout anti India slogans(freedom of speech).If India wanted she could crush every uprising like the chinese and kick out media personnel.In kashmir a BBC journaslist can film a kashmiri getting beaten up by soilders,whereas in China forget abt getting anywhere close to the troubled region.
 
Who said kashmiris have no freedom.Don't u see the huge protests in the valley where people shout anti India slogans(freedom of speech).If India wanted she could crush every uprising like the chinese and kick out media personnel.In kashmir a BBC journaslist can film a kashmiri getting beaten up by soilders,whereas in China forget abt getting anywhere close to the troubled region.

No retaliation Unless Otherwise stone pelting....
 
if you remember when pakistan and india got sperate it was mulim majority vs hindu majority ...kashmir was muslim majority not hindu but the ruler of the state was hindu soo he gave kashmir to india which was wrong ... soo in the future i hope to see kashmir in future independant or with pakistan .... not with bias india

You are wrong here.

It wasn't muslim majority vs hindu majority

It was muslim majority vs those who didn't want to migrate to the
new state.

I don't think you need to be reminded that India still has more muslims than Pakistan, which is a proof that Muslims were not confident with the idea of a new state for them. They chose to stay with their country. You can't claim these people just because they are muslims. You people left because you wanted to, they didn't.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom