What's new

‘Pakistani law does not guarantee journalists’ safety’

Question : Why security for journalists ? Why not request safety for all human being ?
 
:haha:

The terrorism bull crap falls flat on its face when they find Bin "P"aden from your back yard.
You have a problem, take it the UN ..

Oh wait .. you did .. They put more of your Pakistani brethren on the terrorist hot lists :D
lol just like u have RSS, BJP, shiv sehna, VHP, Baljrang Dal, Ajit Doval and Modi?:omghaha::omghaha::omghaha:

We may have just one but u people have an entire army of them.
 
I thought safety of every person is already guaranteed in constitution.
 
lol just like u have RSS, BJP, shiv sehna, VHP, Baljrang Dal, Ajit Doval and Modi?:omghaha::omghaha::omghaha:

We may have just one but u people have an entire army of them.

Guess what, our Modis and Dovals are being hailed and honored by the countries around the world while your Hafiz Muhammad Saeeds are hiding in their shitty bunkers in Pakistan waiting to be droned by CIA or a bullet in the head from Mossad or RAW...

Whos got the egg in his face now poochie ???:haha:
 
Guess what, our Modis and Dovals are being hailed and honored by the countries around the world while your Hafiz Muhammad Saeeds are hiding in their shitty bunkers in Pakistan waiting to be droned by CIA or a bullet in the head from Mossad or RAW...

Whos got the egg in his face now poochie ???:haha:
ENDcgyB.jpg


Modi's reaction after reading yr comments. bwahahaha

A country of jokers.
 
Hi,

Please sir no hard feeling here, I have never endorsed killing of journalists, rather you are lying like a typical jew trying to malign the facts -
Hey, you just accused me of doing what I demonstrated you were guilty of! - and tried to blacken all other Jews besides.

That's two more strikes against you: inversion of the truth and proof-by-bigotry. Why should anybody honor the rest of what you say or write, rather than scorn it?
 
Why should anybody honor the rest of what you say or write, rather than scorn it?
Hi,

I not only find your attitude hypocritical but appalling too !

Why should we listen to you, when you conveniently ignore and disregard the all atrocities carried out by an invader nation which is infact not recognized by many countries and yet you have the audacity to discuss what goes in PAKISTAN !

How about cleaning and setting your own 'invaded' house on order rather than silencing people and activists by killing them in cold blood.

How far will you people go to silence the truth ?
 
This is how they report. It is not journalism when the reporting party is not dispassionate.
I used to think that. Until I started attending events with the press myself and witnessed a nationally-known "dispassionate" anchorwoman snarl with hatred towards a speaker - George Shultz - and stomp out of the room, taking her journalist friends with her. There was no coverage of Shultz that night, who gave a magnificent speech on the Reagan Administration's foreign policy. I realized then I was confusing form with substance.

Hi, I not only find your attitude hypocritical but appalling too !
Of course. You're presupposing the conclusion of your argument. That's another kind of logical fallacy - usually called the "complex question" fallacy. That Pakistan's Higher Education Commission is attempting to enshrine such fallacies by claiming their enforcement is a constitutional matter is yet another one of Pakistan's problems: diseased thinking is promoted by the Establishment to better enforce their subjection of the populace.
 
I used to think that. Until I started attending events with the press myself and witnessed a nationally-known "dispassionate" anchorwoman snarl with hatred towards a speaker - George Shultz - and stomp out of the room, taking her journalist friends with her. There was no coverage of Shultz that night, who gave a magnificent speech on the Reagan Administration's foreign policy. I realized then I was confusing form with substance.

Of course. You're presupposing the conclusion of your argument. That's another kind of logical fallacy - usually called the "complex question" fallacy. That Pakistan's Higher Education Commission is attempting to enshrine such fallacies by claiming their enforcement is a constitutional matter is yet another one of Pakistan's problems: diseased thinking is promoted by the Establishment to better enforce their subjection of the populace.
Hi,

Its not a lie though that invaders have killed activist as well journalist during broad dalyight , or for you is it?

Regardless, Jew considers a non Jew as not the chosen one, its enshrined in your religious text far more dangerous and disturbing. With your chief rabbi and minister openly calling for genocide of innocent Palestinians is proof enough of hardcore terrorist mentality that is prevailant in your society.

How about you address those problems first than pointing your fingers here. I mean we can never reach that level where you guys have built your society on captured, invaded land and with daily killings
 
Regardless, Jew considers a non Jew as -
Here, "regardless" and what follows is employed to tell the reader not to pay attention to Pakistan's problems but demonize someone else instead.

There's no two ways about it: for salarsikander and his lot, Pakistani journalists can be murdered, individually or even en masse, as long as Jews and their supporters can be demonized (whether the accusations against Jews are true or not.) Therefore, the citizens of Pakistani need not be protected from evils that people normally expect governments to protect them from, leaving officials free to pursue their own desires with little scrutiny. To s-kander & co, that is what makes Jews important in their everyday lives.

That's the legitimacy to rule and teach they expect from Pakistanis - and Pakistanis' acquiescence to such oppression is taken as validation. Is it any wonder that crime and corruption flourishes in Pakistan?
 
Here, "regardless" and what follows is employed to tell the reader not to pay attention to Pakistan's problems but demonize someone else instead.

There's no two ways about it: for salarsikander and his lot, Pakistani journalists can be murdered, individually or even en masse, as long as Jews and their supporters can be demonized (whether the accusations against Jews are true or not.) Therefore, the citizens of Pakistani need not be protected from evils that people normally expect governments to protect them from, leaving officials free to pursue their own desires with little scrutiny. To s-kander & co, that is what makes Jews important in their everyday lives.

That's the legitimacy to rule and teach they expect from Pakistanis - and Pakistanis' acquiescence to such oppression is taken as validation. Is it any wonder that crime and corruption flourishes in Pakistan?
Sir,

My only concern is with your hypocrite behaviour which you seem to ignore every single time.

How about you focus on what goes in invaded land and we focus with problem we have here. Because you see you dont have right considering the fact that your invaded society has a good track record !

Have you ever seen me posting stuff about invaders? like yo do in pakistan ?

Why I dont do it ? because I know my country has enough problem of its own( even though we dont kill innocent people and grab their land on daily basis)

So you see you are the one who here is hell bent on demonizing Pakistan.

I have never seen a single article from you on atrocities of carried by jews on poor helpless souls.

So instead of shifting the focus from barbarity behavior that invaders exhibit, you are more interested to discuss what is faced by third world country like Pakistan which has no whatsoever link with invaders.

You should come clean to preach others, right ? And never have I supported the killing of journalists or denied it, you on the other hand seem to ignore the countless times invaders have killed not only journalist but activist and unarmed little children too, I am sure you can find a good UN report filled with tonnes of pages with that

For a man who is mid 50s, aint you got a better job ?

And when can we expect to see some decent articles from you on your society ?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom