What's new

No Difference between 'Netanyahu' & 'Paris terrorists':Turkish PM

Devil Soul

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
22,931
Reaction score
45
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Turkish PM compares Netanyahu with 'Paris terrorists'
By AFP
Published: January 15, 2015

ANKARA: Turkish Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu on Thursday said Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had committed crimes against humanity comparable to those behind the Paris attacks that left 17 dead.

“Netanyahu has committed crimes against humanity the same like those terrorists who carried out the Paris massacre,” he told reporters in televised comments, pointing to the deadly 2010 Israeli assault on a Turkish aid vessel and last year’s onslaught on Hamas-controlled Gaza.

Davutoglu further said freedom of the press does not give a licence to insult, describing the publication of cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed (PBUH) as a “grave provocation”.

“Freedom of the press does not mean freedom to insult,” Davutoglu told reporters in Ankara a day after leading Turkish daily Cumhuriyet and Internet sites published cartoons featuring the Prophet (PBUH) from the special Charlie Hebdo issue. “We cannot allow insults to the prophet (PBUH)… Printing the cartoon is a grave provocation,” he said.
 
This guy is a mega troll:partay:
 
Turkish " CERTIFICATES " have no value

Israeli PM was at the Sunday rally in Paris
 
Freedom of expression. Beat them with the same stick.

No No.. Don't do it... Some people get offended on PDF.
 
Is there something wrong with the Turkish PM?

Regardless of personal opinion, responsible Nation States don't use such language against other elected head of states. They can convey the same message more subtly. This will only erode Turkey's influence amongst other nations.
 
Turkish " CERTIFICATES " have no value

Israeli PM was at the Sunday rally in Paris

They certainly do. Otherwise you wouldn't be refuting the Turkish claim.

Where was the Israeli PM when massacring innocent civilians in Palestine?

Is there something wrong with the Turkish PM?

Regardless of personal opinion, responsible Nation States don't use such language against other elected head of states. They can convey the same message more subtly. This will only erode Turkey's influence amongst other nations.

Weren't you a staunch supporter of freedom of speech? Or are we going to make exceptions now? Let him speak his mind. If you don't agree don't read and respond.
 
They certainly do. Otherwise you wouldn't be refuting the Turkish claim.

Where was the Israeli PM when massacring innocent civilians in Palestine?

1 Turkish certificates count only in Pakistan

2 The Palestinian civilians were hand in glove with the Hamas ; so they were the collateral damage
of the war . Why did Hamas keep their Rocket launchers inside residential compounds

And the BIGGER point is that since the day Israel has stopped Turkish Navy from
providing aid to Gaza ; Turkey has been angry with Israel

Hence such remarks ; But Israel doesnt give give a ****
 
No No.. Don't do it... Some people get offended on PDF.
There is a bit of difference between freedom of expression & freedom of murder...
 
There is a bit of difference between freedom of expression & freedom of murder...

Making fun of Prophet on the newspaper is Freedom Of Expression.. "Condemning Netanyahu for killing innocent Palestinians and condemning against making cartoons is Freedom of Murder". You are right in your own way.
 
Weren't you a staunch supporter of freedom of speech? Or are we going to make exceptions now? Let him speak his mind. If you don't agree don't read and respond.
Don't quote me next time onwards. I prefer to talk with those educated. You parroting statements in the last thread we spoke in, told us your comprehension skills.

This has nothing to do with freedom of speech. The Turkish PM can say anything he wants. I said that Heads of Nations of responsible countries do not use such language when talking about other elected Head of State's. Thats just not how it is done - making it a mud slinging match between elected heads.

Diplomatic language is still used to convey whatever one nation wants to convey irrespective of severe the issue is.
 
All Hail The Great Sultan :victory:
 
There is a difference. Terrorist do all in their capacity to kill others. If Netanyahu does that than all Arab countries willl become a graveyard.
 
1 Turkish certificates count only in Pakistan

2 The Palestinian civilians were hand in glove with the Hamas ; so they were the collateral damage
of the war . Why did Hamas keep their Rocket launchers inside residential compounds

And the BIGGER point is that since the day Israel has stopped Turkish Navy from
providing aid to Gaza ; Turkey has been angry with Israel

Hence such remarks ; But Israel doesnt give give a ****

The certificates also count for those Indians earning their living in Turkey. I've seen plenty of them.

So? Of course the Palestinians were! Hamas it's a political party and the Palestinians have every right to stand with this party if they choose to. Just because you or your Israeli friends label it as a terrorist outfits doesn't make it one. They are fighting and struggling for their existence. Why did Israel kill 2000+ innocent Palestinian civilians? Why does Israel steal Palestinian land?

The beef between Israel, Turkey and frankly most of the world is very simple. The Israelis need to stop killing innocent Palestinian civilians. The Israelis need to stop stealing Palestinian land. Nothing more thing less.

Are you the spokesperson of Israel? Israel cares because the vast majority of the world including the EU/US denounce land grabbing and killing. Your denial isn't going to change this reality one iota.

Don't quote me next time onwards. I prefer to talk with those educated. You parroting statements in the last thread we spoke in, told us your comprehension skills.

This has nothing to do with freedom of speech. The Turkish PM can say anything he wants. I said that Heads of Nations of responsible countries do not use such language when talking about other elected Head of State's. Thats just not how it is done - making it a mud slinging match between elected heads.

Diplomatic language is still used to convey whatever one nation wants to convey irrespective of severe the issue is.

I'll quote you whenever I want to. Try stopping me. In my eyes, there's no one more ignorant than the likes of yourself. You tow one line which only favours your narrative. You will switch sides in a heartbeat when it suits your narrative.

It has everything to do with freedom of speech. Whatever you say is irrelevant. You don't like his stance? Stop reading and responding to it. The Turkish PM can say whatever is on his mind. Just like everyone in the West can draw cartoons and offend people belonging to a certain faith or culture. This flip flopping and double standards of yours aren't going to cut it any more. It's obvious as daylight.

Fvck the diplomatic language when thousands of innocent people are butchered in the name of a book which promises a piece of land to the "promised" people. Walls are build to separate people of flesh and blood. Their orchards destroyed so that Jewish settlers and their children can occupy this space. Keep your diplomatic language inside your pocket.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom