What's new

U.S. Congress to approve funds for Marines' move from Okinawa to Guam

Aepsilons

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
May 29, 2014
Messages
24,871
Reaction score
118
Country
Japan
Location
United States
WASHINGTON (Kyodo) -- The U.S. Congress decided Tuesday to lift a freeze on funding for transferring some Marines from Okinawa to Guam, a move that could help an effort to reduce the Japanese island's burden of hosting U.S. forces.

The Armed Services committees of the Senate and the House of Representatives agreed to ensure the passage of bills for the National Defense Authorization Act, which includes an outline of defense budgetary plans.

The act for fiscal 2015, which began Oct. 1, is expected to clear the House this week and the Senate next week, according to congressional sources.

The U.S. and Japanese governments plan to transfer some 4,000 of the 19,000 Marines stationed in the southern Japan island to Guam based on a bilateral agreement, with Japan shouldering up to $2.8 billion of an estimated $8.6 billion cost for the move.

Along with the move, Tokyo and Washington are also working on relocating the Marine Corps' Futenma Air Station, a major Marine facility in Okinawa, from a populated area to a coastal site.

"We welcome the developments that have taken place in the U.S. Congress," Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary Hiroshige Seko said Thursday at a press conference in Tokyo.

The transfer of those Marines to Guam "will ease the burden on Okinawa, for instance in terms of the return of land located south of Kadena (air base), and at the same time maintain the U.S. forces' deterrence capabilities," Seko said. "We will continue to work closely toward an early transfer."

The U.S. Congress had frozen most of the funding under the act for fiscal 2014, questioning the feasibility of the transfer. The Senate had earlier sought to keep the freeze for fiscal 2015.

The committees agreed to set a ceiling of $8.7 billion on the transfer cost.

To address the Senate's concern about the cost, the Defense Department submitted a Marines transfer master plan earlier this year.

Japan and the United States agreed to transfer Marines from Okinawa to Guam and relocate the airfield as part of the U.S. plan to realign military forces in the Asia-Pacific area and bilateral bids to help Okinawa, which already hosts the bulk of U.S. military facilities in Japan.

It has already been 18 years since both governments first agreed to relocate the Futenma base in 1996, but there is no sign the project will be implemented soon due to opposition in the local community.


U.S. Congress to approve funds for Marines' move from Okinawa to Guam - 毎日新聞

@SvenSvensonov , @AMDR , @LeveragedBuyout , @F-22Raptor , @gambit
 
WASHINGTON (Kyodo) -- The U.S. Congress decided Tuesday to lift a freeze on funding for transferring some Marines from Okinawa to Guam, a move that could help an effort to reduce the Japanese island's burden of hosting U.S. forces.

The Armed Services committees of the Senate and the House of Representatives agreed to ensure the passage of bills for the National Defense Authorization Act, which includes an outline of defense budgetary plans.

The act for fiscal 2015, which began Oct. 1, is expected to clear the House this week and the Senate next week, according to congressional sources.

The U.S. and Japanese governments plan to transfer some 4,000 of the 19,000 Marines stationed in the southern Japan island to Guam based on a bilateral agreement, with Japan shouldering up to $2.8 billion of an estimated $8.6 billion cost for the move.

Along with the move, Tokyo and Washington are also working on relocating the Marine Corps' Futenma Air Station, a major Marine facility in Okinawa, from a populated area to a coastal site.

"We welcome the developments that have taken place in the U.S. Congress," Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary Hiroshige Seko said Thursday at a press conference in Tokyo.

The transfer of those Marines to Guam "will ease the burden on Okinawa, for instance in terms of the return of land located south of Kadena (air base), and at the same time maintain the U.S. forces' deterrence capabilities," Seko said. "We will continue to work closely toward an early transfer."

The U.S. Congress had frozen most of the funding under the act for fiscal 2014, questioning the feasibility of the transfer. The Senate had earlier sought to keep the freeze for fiscal 2015.

The committees agreed to set a ceiling of $8.7 billion on the transfer cost.

To address the Senate's concern about the cost, the Defense Department submitted a Marines transfer master plan earlier this year.

Japan and the United States agreed to transfer Marines from Okinawa to Guam and relocate the airfield as part of the U.S. plan to realign military forces in the Asia-Pacific area and bilateral bids to help Okinawa, which already hosts the bulk of U.S. military facilities in Japan.

It has already been 18 years since both governments first agreed to relocate the Futenma base in 1996, but there is no sign the project will be implemented soon due to opposition in the local community.


U.S. Congress to approve funds for Marines' move from Okinawa to Guam - 毎日新聞

@SvenSvensonov , @AMDR , @LeveragedBuyout , @F-22Raptor , @gambit

Unlike @LeveragedBuyout @AMDR @F22Raptor - I'm not going to "like" your post because of the content (assuming this is the reason), though I will out of courtesy and as a thanks for the information. In my opinion this is the worst possible option for the US military, though the Navy and Air Force will still have their presence in Japan, so it's not like we are leaving the country all together. However, moving the Marines, a branch that is the rapid response unit of the US military lessens that capability of both Japan and the US to response rapidly to a crisis. Like @LeveragedBuyout I'll believe it when I see it, this might be a threat to get Japanese politicians to get off their asses and solve the situation, but i don't believe this is the best course of action if it comes to pass.

And for those that are wondering about the US presence in Japan, and are cheering about the US leaving Japan, let this calm your fervor:

Air Force FAC 1054 Camp Chitose
(Chitose III, Chitose Administration Annex) Communications Chitose, Hokkaido
FAC 2001 Misawa Air Base Air Base Misawa, Aomori
FAC 3013 Yokota Air Base Air Base Fussa, Tokyo
FAC 3016 Fuchu Communications Station Communications Fuchu, Tokyo
FAC 3019 Tama Service Annex
(Tama Hills Recreation Center) Recreation Inagi, Tokyo
FAC 3048 Camp Asaka
(South Camp Drake AFN Transmitter Site) Barracks
(Broadcasting) Wako, Saitama
FAC 3049 Tokorozawa Communications Station
(Tokorozawa Transmitter Site) Communications Tokorozawa, Saitama
FAC 3056 Owada Communication Site Communications Niiza, Saitama
FAC 3162 Yugi Communication Site Communications Hachioji, Tokyo
FAC 4100 Sofu Communication Site Communications Iwakuni, Yamaguchi
FAC 5001 Itazuke Auxiliary Airfield Air Cargo Terminal Hakata-ku, Fukuoka
FAC 5073 Sefurisan Liaison Annex
(Seburiyama Communications Station) Communications Kanzaki, Saga
FAC 5091 Tsushima Communication Site Communications Tsushima, Nagasaki
FAC 6004 Okuma Rest Center Recreation Kunigami, Okinawa
FAC 6006 Yaedake Communication Site Communications Motobu, Okinawa
FAC 6022 Kadena Ammunition Storage Area Storage Onna, Okinawa
FAC 6037 Kadena Air Base Air Base Kadena, Okinawa
FAC 6077 Tori Shima Range Training Kumejima, Okinawa
FAC 6078 Idesuna Jima Range Training Tonaki, Okinawa
FAC 6080 Kume Jima Range Training Kumejima, Okinawa

Army

FAC 2070 Shariki Communication Site Communications Tsugaru, Aomori
FAC 3004 Akasaka Press Center
(Hardy Barracks) Office Minato, Tokyo
FAC 3067 Yokohama North Dock Port Facility Yokohama, Kanagawa
FAC 3079 Camp Zama Office Zama, Kanagawa
FAC 3084 Sagami General Depot Logistics Sagamihara, Kanagawa
FAC 3102 Sagamihara Housing Area Housing Sagamihara, Kanagawa
FAC 4078 Akizuki Ammunition Depot Storage Etajima, Hiroshima
FAC 4083 Kawakami Ammunition Depot Storage Higashihiroshima, Hiroshima
FAC 4084 Hiro Ammunition Depot Storage Kure, Hiroshima
FAC 4152 Kure Pier No.6 Port Facility Kure, Hiroshima
FAC 4611 Haigamine Communication Site Communications Kure, Hiroshima
FAC 6007 Gesaji Communication Site Communications Higashi, Okinawa
FAC 6036 Torii Communications Station
(Torii Station) Communications Yomitan, Okinawa
FAC 6064 Naha Port Port Facility Naha, Okinawa
FAC 6076 Army POL Depots Storage Uruma, Okinawa

Navy

FAC 2006 Hachinohe POL Depot Storage Hachinohe, Aomori
FAC 2012 Misawa ATG Range
(R130, Draughon Range) Training Misawa, Aomori
FAC 3033 Kisarazu Auxiliary Landing Field Air Facility Kisarazu, Chiba
FAC 3066 Negishi Dependent Housing Area
(Naval Housing Annex Negishi) Housing Yokohama, Kanagawa
FAC 3083 Naval Air Facility Atsugi Air Facility Ayase, Kanagawa
FAC 3087 Ikego Housing Area and Navy Annex Housing Zushi, Kanagawa
FAC 3090 Azuma Storage Area Storage Yokosuka, Kanagawa
FAC 3096 Kamiseya Communications Station
(Naval Support Facility Kamiseya) Communications
(Housing) Yokohama, Kanagawa
FAC 3097 Fukaya Communication Site
(Naval Transmitter Station Totsuka) Communications Yokohama, Kanagawa
FAC 3099 United States Fleet Activities Yokosuka Port Facility Yokosuka, Kanagawa
FAC 3117 Urago Ammunition Depot Storage Yokosuka, Kanagawa
FAC 3144 Tsurumi POL Depot Storage Yokohama, Kanagawa
FAC 3181 Iwo Jima Communication Site Communications
(Training) Ogasawara, Tokyo
FAC 3185 New Sanno U.S. Forces Center Recreation Minato, Tokyo
FAC 5029 United States Fleet Activities Sasebo Port Facility Sasebo, Nagasaki
FAC 5030 Sasebo Dry Dock Area Port Facility Sasebo, Nagasaki
FAC 5032 Akasaki POL Depot Storage Sasebo, Nagasaki
FAC 5033 Sasebo Ammunition Supply Point Storage Sasebo, Nagasaki
FAC 5036 Iorizaki POL Depot Storage Sasebo, Nagasaki
FAC 5039 Yokose POL Depot Storage Saikai, Nagasaki
FAC 5050 Harioshima Ammunition Storage Area Storage Sasebo, Nagasaki
FAC 5086 Tategami Basin Port Area Port Facility Sasebo, Nagasaki
FAC 5118 Sakibe Navy Annex Hangar Sasebo, Nagasaki
FAC 5119 Hario Dependent Housing Area
(Hario Family Housing Area) Housing Sasebo, Nagasaki
FAC 6028 Tengan Pier Port Facility Uruma, Okinawa
FAC 6032 Camp Shields Barracks Okinawa, Okinawa
FAC 6046 Awase Communications Station Communications Okinawa, Okinawa
FAC 6048 White Beach Area Port Facility Uruma, Okinawa
FAC 6084 Kobi Sho Range Training Ishigaki, Okinawa
FAC 6085 Sekibi Sho Range Training Ishigaki, Okinawa
FAC 6088 Oki Daito Jima Range Training Kitadaito, Okinawa

Marine Corps

FAC 3127 Camp Fuji Barracks Gotenba, Shizuoka
FAC 3154 Numazu Training Area Training Numazu, Shizuoka
FAC 4092 Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni Air Station Iwakuni, Yamaguchi
FAC 6001 Northern Training Area
(Incl. Camp Gonsalves) Training Kunigami, Okinawa
FAC 6005 Ie Jima Auxiliary Airfield Training Ie, Okinawa
FAC 6009 Camp Schwab Training Nago, Okinawa
FAC 6010 Henoko Ordnance Ammunition Depot Storage Nago, Okinawa
FAC 6011 Camp Hansen Training Kin, Okinawa
FAC 6019 Kin Red Beach Training Area Training Kin, Okinawa
FAC 6020 Kin Blue Beach Training Area Training Kin, Okinawa
FAC 6029 Camp Courtney Barracks Uruma, Okinawa
FAC 6031 Camp McTureous Barracks Uruma, Okinawa
FAC 6043 Camp Kuwae (Camp Lester) Medical Facility Chatan, Okinawa
FAC 6044 Camp Zukeran (Camp Foster) Barracks Chatan, Okinawa
FAC 6051 Marine Corps Air Station Futenma Air Station Ginowan, Okinawa
FAC 6056 Makiminato Service Area (Camp Kinser) Logistics Urasoe, Okinawa
FAC 6082 Tsuken Jima Training Area Training Uruma, Okinawa

We're not going anywhere!!!

United States Forces Japan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

*Sorry about the format of the list! This list is formated as: MilDep code, USFJ Admin Code, Instillation name, role, actual location.
 
Last edited:
It is indeed a "predicament" that we are in. The truth of the matter is that most of the general public in Okinawa are against the presence of US forces in the prefecture. Politically speaking, Abe and or his successors may overturn the Gubernatorial decision to move the Futenma base to its new location, this would represent a breach of Executive powers and would lead to a constitutional court review. Technically speaking this would, in regards to the culture of Japan's National Diet, lead to a political debate on abuse of powers by the LDP / Komeito Parties. Abe did not make a decision, and quite frankly if he does get re-elected (which i am quite skeptical about now), he will have to make sure that he addresses this issue soon.

@SvenSvensonov , the plan is to move some 4,000 US Marines from Okinawa to Guam, not the entire force of some 19,000. So even after this happens, there still will be some 15,000 US Marines in Okinawa. But in regards to Force Projection, this would be a reduction in rapid response.
 
However, moving the Marines, a branch that is the rapid response unit of the US military lessens that capability of both Japan and the US to response rapidly to a crisis. Like @LeveragedBuyout I'll believe it when I see it, this might be a threat to get Japanese politicians to get off their asses and solve the situation, but i don't believe this is the best course of action if it comes to pass.

@SvenSvensonov ,

There is one possibility of countering this predicament. That is the implementation of diverting the forces from Futenma to Japan's own Ground Self Defense Forces Military Bases. Perhaps US Marines can be diverted / relocated to Japanese Military Bases on a rotational platform wherein A battalion or so will be stationed in a base for a specified amount of time, before being rotated to another. This way, it can totally bypass any issue of building a "new" military base, yet at the same time maintaining force projection capabilities. And besides, 19,000 or so US Marines would be seamlessly spread and join the some 200,000 JGSDF forces in JGSDF military bases, or naval bases.

We'll see what happens.
 
Either way, it's a problem. We shouldn't be moving anything other then the location of the base. Downsizing any force puts the operational capabilities of the entire force at risk... oh, and sorry, I didn't actually read the article before commenting:D - I don't usually forgo reading articles, I was in a hurry to rant! do that. I was too miffed by the headline! I don't like the plan, but still believe it's just a way for us to twist the arm of Japanese politicians.

So my friend who is stationed in Maizuru Naval District told me that specified number of US Marines are already being 'rotated' for specific amount of time there. They are actively training the new battalion of Rikusentai there. So whatever the case, I don't expect US Marine presence to leave as they invaluable in the training and molding of the Rikusentai, which expects to create its first batch of 5 Battalions. Full strength is to be around 1-2 divisions strong.

Seriously tho i wonder what the JMSDF is expecting to do with 20,000 US Marines-trained Rikusentai. ;)

I think we should just pull a "China", build an artificial island, claim it as sovereign US territory, make a map that proves it and station our marines there. Rotating a force between bases is an option, with the amount of bases already used by the US it can be done, but move assets further north, east or south or west will require the US to shift its logistics capability to meet the demands of a rotating contingent... it's going to be problematic. But given that the Marines are part of the USN, I have a soft-spot for them and don't want to see any fight over their moving to a different location. If this is what is considered best, and I don't think it is nor that the US military brass believe that either, I will support a moving of some Marines to an already crowded Guam.

ha ha ha! This is quite interesting. Anyways, there is so much one has to consider, what the media portrays and actual behind-the-scenes military policy. Exciting development(s) tho.
 
4000 too little. All troops should be relocated to Guam as this is the demand of the majority of Okinawans.

And even this may never happen, actually, as has been mentioned above, since the moving to Guam thing has been on the table for long time. Probably a stunt move to silence the Okinawan dissent.

Why is it so hard for Tokyo to respect the long-time demands of its own people, @Nihonjin1051 ?
 
4000 too little. All troops should be relocated to Guam as this is the demand of the majority of Okinawans.

And even this may never happen, actually, as has been mentioned above, since the moving to Guam thing has been on the table for long time. Probably a stunt move to silence the Okinawan dissent.

Why is it so hard for Tokyo to respect the long-time demands of its own people, @Nihonjin1051 ?

Balancing Japanese Interests and the Strategic Alliance is never an easy thing. I do empathize with the Okinawans, and if this strategic alliance is to be maintained, there should be shared responsibility. I've been to Okinawa plenty of times and I do agree that there are definite risks in the Futenma Base and military craft landing so close to civilian zones, which has been a major issue pointed out by local opposition.

If the Japanese Government really want to address the issues of the Okinawan Prefecture, then troops should be redistributed to other areas of Japan or they may request the US Military to vacate Okinawa and redistribute these to Guam and other US-military bases in the pacific.
 
Let the US fight big war on Europe side, perhaps with Russia on large scale, so that US need to use all her force.
Only then Japan can be free from US occupation.
 
I think we should just pull a "China", build an artificial island, claim it as sovereign US territory, make a map that proves it and station our marines there. Rotating a force between bases is an option, with the amount of bases already used by the US it can be done, but move assets further north, east or south or west will require the US to shift its logistics capability to meet the demands of a rotating contingent... it's going to be problematic. But given that the Marines are part of the USN, I have a soft-spot for them and don't want to see any fight over their moving to a different location. If this is what is considered best, and I don't think it is nor that the US military brass believe that either, I will support a moving of some Marines to an already crowded Guam.

Wouldn't it be better to build a new base in the southern Ryukyus? That's where the action is after all and it would be very well located to help Taiwan in case of chinese invasion. Quite a few islands there and can also do land reclamation for the base, an air / naval base there would be good.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom