A Muslim majority Indus Valley Civilization?

[Uchiha]

Please!!
the King, wanted an independent Kashmir, so he tried putting off accesion for as long as he could. But Pakistan, fearing India moving in the troops, sent Tribals instead...............they could be claimed as Pakistan's own if they won, and Non State actors if they lost...............but when the going got tough, regular Pakistani troops started pouring in support of the tribals, inside the Kashmir region, which is when the King signed the instrument of accesion and joined India.
You can reffer to the sources at the bottom of the page ,as my source...........
Indo-Pakistani War of 1947 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

HOw the fck does it make sense for a demoracy loving india to follow the request of the king and not the Muslim majority people(obviously because he's HINDU)?
Btw, the kashmiris could relate more to the tribals culturally than to random indian soldiers and weirdo biased hindu rulers.

 

[p(-)0ENiX]

Egyptians, Algerians, Syrians, Moroccans, and Iraqis etc have huge contribution to the islamic civilization. What you must know that people in those countries are NOT Arabs by ethnic and other historic means.

The true arabs are khaleejiis (Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait, UAE, Qatar), which have absolutely no contribution to science and technology.

Lol, I already know that North African & Levantine Arabs are Arabs by language & culture alone. The Arabs of Arabia are primarily Ishmaelites mixed with the indigenous of the land. However the identity "Arab" these days comes from language & culture rather than genetics.

By the way, the people of Babylon, the Levant, & Arabia are all Semitic cousins descending from the eldest son of Noah (PBUH). They are all related in some way or another. The Phoenicians (Lebanese) migrated extensively in the past to North Africa, even the Carthaginian civilization has links to them thus even the people of North Africa are to an extent Semites mixed with Hamites.

The Egyptians for example have a close relation with Gulf Arabs or Ishmaelites seeing as the mother of Ishmael (PBUH) was from Egypt.

 

[Uchiha]

Egyptians, Algerians, Syrians, Moroccans, and Iraqis etc have huge contribution to the islamic civilization. What you must know that people in those countries are NOT Arabs by ethnic and other historic means.

The true arabs are khaleejiis (Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait, UAE, Qatar), which have absolutely no contribution to science and technology.

Not true, UAE has a few scientists in it's history who did many important contributions, forgot their names, i learner this in grade 7 or something

 

[punit]

^ kashmir in 47 was an independent princely state. It decided to merge with india when attackd by the western ummah brothers !

 

[funtoosh]

HOw the fck does it make sense for a demoracy loving india to follow the request of the king and not the Muslim majority people(obviously because he's HINDU)?
Btw, the kashmiris could relate more to the tribals culturally than to random indian soldiers and weirdo biased hindu rulers.

the democracy comes into play after they have joined.

the people of the IVC was current day indians. they were driven out by islamic invaders from arabia and central asia.
most of the paks today are either central asians(CA) or half CA (men) - half IVC (women) or half arab (men) - half IVC women.

the real people who formed this great civilization moved east to current day india

 

[Rusty]

^ kashmir in 47 was an independent princely state. It decided to merge with india when attackd by the western ummah brothers !

Then why not use that same logic and give us Hyderabad and other princely states that decided to go with Pakistan?

Indian greed knows no bounds, They were not happy with having the largest country in South Asia, they wanted to get even more at any cost. Even if it meant the future of the region and the people.

the democracy comes into play after they have joined.

the people of the IVC was current day indians. they were driven out by islamic invaders from arabia and central asia.
most of the paks today are either central asians(CA) or half CA (men) - half IVC (women) or half arab (men) - half IVC women.

the real people who formed this great civilization moved east to current day india

No more fairy tales for you.
You are starting to lose your grip on reality

 

[tvsram1992]

Then why not use that same logic and give us Hyderabad and other princely states that decided to go with Pakistan?
Indian greed knows no bounds, They were not happy with having the largest country in South Asia, they wanted to get even more at any cost. Even if it meant the future of the region and the people.
No more fairy tales for you.
You are starting to lose your grip on reality

FYI we remained to be an independent muslim state , an ally of Pakistan ,not part of Pakistan .
Yes India did cheat and occupied us , where were you when Indians attacked us ? You were pis*ing off your pants that you were just a spectator . You didnt even try to save us . You failed to send bomber planes to us . But now we are very much happy to be a part of Mother India , See how developed we are and how happily we are living Leave about common people , even soldiers are not safe in your country Thank God , if India had not annexed us we would have been another Palestine or Pakistan . Here we really follow Hindu Muslim Bhai Bhai , ps : i dont know about other places of India . I would recommend Delhi to annex Bangladesh in a similar way and if possible Pakistan too after destabilizing it completely . Now we are one of the world class region .

 

[manofwar]

Then why not use that same logic and give us Hyderabad and other princely states that decided to go with Pakistan?

Indian greed knows no bounds, They were not happy with having the largest country in South Asia, they wanted to get even more at any cost. Even if it meant the future of the region and the people.



No more fairy tales for you.
You are starting to lose your grip on reality

For obvious strateic reasons we could not have done that.....................
When the rule of Balochistan wanted to join India, Nehru refused, seeing that it would greatly harm Pakistan's strategic position.................But when it came to repaying the favour Jinnah backstabbed us, and openly supported Hyderabad's accesion to Pakistan.............
And FYI, Patel didn't force all nations to join India, he only hurried them up.......and anyways no nation on the border actually wanted to join Pakistan, it was all composed of Rajputs and Sikhs
I have said this before and I will say it again-If we had wante to conquer South Asia, then we would have done it..................No offence to anyone but rest of the nations in South Asia are quite small , both militaristically and financially, when compared to India

 

[Alfa-Fighter]

at least we don't treat minority the way you treats in Pakistan, nor in pakistan minority do terrorist activity like in india do ...

 

[Uchiha]

FYI we remained to be an independent muslim state , an ally of Pakistan ,not part of Pakistan .
Yes India did cheat and occupied us , where were you when Indians attacked us ? You were pis*ing off your pants that you were just a spectator . You didnt even try to save us . You failed to send bomber planes to us . But now we are very much happy to be a part of Mother India , See how developed we are and how happily we are living Leave about common people , even soldiers are not safe in your country Thank God , if India had not annexed us we would have been another Palestine or Pakistan . Here we really follow Hindu Muslim Bhai Bhai , ps : i dont know about other places of India . I would recommend Delhi to annex Bangladesh in a similar way and if possible Pakistan too after destabilizing it completely . Now we are one of the world class region .

So you're saying you can sell yourself for money? LOL
we're not like that. ANd your post can't be taken seriously, until 1980s Paksitan was far ahead of india in EVERYTHING, from economy, politics, sports, military etc.

 

[Rusty]

For obvious strateic reasons we could not have done that.....................
When the rule of Balochistan wanted to join India, Nehru refused, seeing that it would greatly harm Pakistan's strategic position.................But when it came to repaying the favour Jinnah backstabbed us, and openly supported Hyderabad's accesion to Pakistan.............
And FYI, Patel didn't force all nations to join India, he only hurried them up.......and anyways no nation on the border actually wanted to join Pakistan, it was all composed of Rajputs and Sikhs
I have said this before and I will say it again-If we had wante to conquer South Asia, then we would have done it..................No offence to anyone but rest of the nations in South Asia are quite small , both militaristically and financially, when compared to India

And it is of the utmost importance that Pakistan have Kashmir for our stratification needs. All our water comes from there and poses a huge threat to our existence it it was in India's hand. Also we need Kashmir to link to China.
So if you want us to consider your strategic position then you must consider ours.
Hyderabad being part of Pakistan would really be no big deal for India since it is entirely surrounded by it and India could crush anything that happened there. But Kashmir is vital for our very existence.

And ruler of Baluchistan went with India? this is news to me. Got any evidence?

What do you mean no nation on the border joined Pakistan? of course they didn't they were not muslim majority. Thats like saying no states in India joined China.
Well duh!

Sure India could try and conquer all of South Asia but it wont be easy. You will pay a heavy heavy price. And you know this, that is why you have chosen smaller acts of aggression. Annexing Kashmir, supporting LTTE, killing Bengalis, etc.

So you're saying you can sell yourself for money? LOL
we're not like that. ANd your post can't be taken seriously, until 1980s Paksitan was far ahead of india in EVERYTHING, from economy, politics, sports, military etc.

just ignore him
Hes a massive troll.

 

[Uchiha]

^ kashmir in 47 was an independent princely state. It decided to merge with india when attackd by the western ummah brothers !

"It" didn't decide to merge with India, the hindu tyrant did. If all the kashmiri people had decided that then the Pakistani flag wouldn't be raised in IOK, and the Pakistani Kashmiris on this forum would have had different opinions

the democracy comes into play after they have joined.

the people of the IVC was current day indians. they were driven out by islamic invaders from arabia and central asia.
most of the paks today are either central asians(CA) or half CA (men) - half IVC (women) or half arab (men) - half IVC women.

the real people who formed this great civilization moved east to current day india

Lol, it's a fact that facial features depicted on the paintings/statues are precisely the same as modern day balochs and sindhis

 

[Rusty]

If they respect the decision of a King so much then why don't they give us Hydrabad and the other states that decided to go with Pakistan?
And why did they invade Goa when Goa decided to stay with Portugal?
These Bhartis are incapable of making non-hypocritical statements. It's in their blood to have double standards.

 

[tvsram1992]

So you're saying you can sell yourself for money? LOL
we're not like that. ANd your post can't be taken seriously, until 1980s Paksitan was far ahead of india in EVERYTHING, from economy, politics, sports, military etc.

dont be an idiot , now who gave money to us ? Its all about development , security and living happily . Selling is what you did when you slept in your white masters bed . No Pakistani was as effective and bold like Indira Gandhi . Our economy was better than you . Lol as far i know 1971 comes before 1980 and in other 1971 thread , your mates were saying

India is 7x bigger then Pakistan and has 1/6th of the earths population so Pakistan cannot match India in sheer numbers or size.

We never got out sold for drones to strike us , we never gave chance to any one to kill our soldiers so that we can beg for apology and demand some money .We never hid worlds top terrorist from the money they give. We never allowed terrorists to attack our military base to destroy planes so that we could get new planes under name of WOT . We never begged for money . We never got weapons for free . We never allowed 300 culprits escape from jail as feeding them costs . Please dont boast , you better dont prove yourself as fool . Yes even i dont want you to take my post seriously as i pretty well knew you cannot be changed as its much comfortable for you to live in insecure location . Btw you were a part of India before 1947 .

If they respect the decision of a King so much then why don't they give us Hydrabad and the other states that decided to go with Pakistan?
And why did they invade Goa when Goa decided to stay with Portugal?
These Bhartis are incapable of making non-hypocritical statements. It's in their blood to have double standards.

Please shut your mouth if you dont know anything about Hyderabad . Your govt was coward and were not able to protect us when military action was taking place on us . Dont be a fool what does Goa had to do any thing with Portugese ? We didnt even let our dear brother to take control on Kashmir and why would we let Portugal ? Would you do so if Gilit Balistan want to remain with India ? According your dirty logic , give freedom to Balochistan and Punjab
But Bhartis are capable in action . Ex 1948,1965,1971,1974,1999,Siachen.... Atleast slavery is not in our blood who gave base to white masters and now surrendered to red masters even after independence .

 

[INDIC]

If they respect the decision of a King so much then why don't they give us Hydrabad and the other states that decided to go with Pakistan?
And why did they invade Goa when Goa decided to stay with Portugal?
These Bhartis are incapable of making non-hypocritical statements. It's in their blood to have double standards.

Whatever was ours, we just took it. Can you give me proof that Hyderabad wanted to join Pakistan.