What's new

Oslo attacker Anders Breivik and Eur. right's hate-filled rhetoric

LETS SEND INN NATO ALSO ATACK ANY ONE WHO LOOKS LIKE RICHARD OR PERSON WHO CALL HIMSELF RICARHD, KILL EVERY ONE WHO ARE IN SAME HOUSE TO FIND OUT LATER THAT IT WAS WRONG RICHARD. BUT WE SHALL NOT STOP KILLING UNNTIL WE FIND RIGHT RICHARD. SO LETS THE WAR BEGIN
 
None of the reasons mentioned below explains or justifies his acts !

Oslo attacker feared

KARACHI:

Anders Behring Breivik, the Norwegian terrorist who killed more than 90 people in two attacks in Oslo, was mortally terrified of the idea of several ‘mini Pakistans’ appearing all over the map of Europe.

In a 1,600-page manifesto titled ‘2083: A European Declaration of Independence’, Breivik laid out a stark picture of the future of Europe, citing poor human rights in Pakistan as the fate of the continent. Norwegian authorities confirmed on Sunday that the manifesto was written by Breivik.

In his doomsday scenario for Europe, Breivik predicts that several ‘mini-Pakistans’ would be created all over Europe by 2083, one in each country due to ‘Lebanon-style’ conflicts. “It could be similar to the division of India after World War II, with the creation of one or several Islamic ‘Pakistan’ enclaves,” he says.

While Breivik’s rhetoric against Muslim immigration into Europe is not unusual, he cites many names that might be familiar to Pakistanis, including Allama Muhammad Iqbal and Maulana Abul Ala Maududi, as well as prominent human rights activist Hina Jilani and Dawn columnist Irfan Hussain.

He seems to believe that Iqbal, in particular, was sympathetic to communism and views multiculturalism as a Marxist concept. He quotes Iqbal as saying “Islam equals communism plus Allah.”

Breivik also claims that Pakistan is systematically annihilating all non-Muslim communities. He claimed that Hindu girls are being forced to convert to Islam in Sindh. In this context he even quotes Hina Jilani as saying: “Have you ever heard of an Indian Muslim girl being forced to embrace Hinduism? It’s Muslims winning by intimidation.”

He goes on to describe the situation for Christians in Pakistan as being no better, citing Father Emmanuel Asi of the Theological Institute for Laity in Lahore as saying in 2007 that Pakistani Christians are frequently denied equal rights.

Jamaat-e-Islami founder Abul Ala Maududi is also quoted in the manifesto, though in a manner that would imply that the stated objective of an Islamic state is to kill or subdue all non-Muslims around the world.

Breivik seems to be a fan of Daily Times columnist Razi Azmi, whom he calls “one of the more sensible columnists of Pakistan”. He mentions one of Azmi’s pieces where the columnist asks whether it was possible to imagine a Muslim converting to Christianity or Hinduism or Buddhism in a Muslim country, using it to support his view of Islam as an intolerant religion.

He also cites Dawn’s Irfan Hussain’s column criticising Hizb u-Tahrir’s vision of a caliphate.

His ire against Pakistanis and Muslims seems to have at least partial origin in personal experience. He speaks at length about his childhood best friend, a Pakistani Muslim immigrant to Norway who, despite having lived several years in Europe still appeared to resent Norway and Norwegian society. “Not because he was jealous… but because it represented the exact opposite of Islamic ways,” Breivik conjectures.

The inability of Muslim immigrants to assimilate into European society seems to bother him, which he blames on Muslim parents not allowing their children to adopt European ways. He also asks why Muslim girls are considered ‘off-limits’ to everyone, including Muslim boys, and why Muslim men view ethnic Norwegian women as ‘whores’.

He also seems to believe that the Muslims in Europe who collect government benefits view it as a form of jizya, a medieval Islamic tax charged on non-Muslim minorities.

He rails against multiculturalism, which he blames for making immigration too easy for Muslims in Europe. “When the veil of multiculturalism disappears, it will be Pakistanis who live in London, Turks who live in Berlin, Algerians who live in Paris and Moroccans who live in Amsterdam. And then the show begins,” he says.

That show, he says, is a dramatic demographic shift that he calls the ‘Pakistanisation of Europe’.

Published in The Express Tribune, July 25th, 2011.
 
pakistan pakistan every thing in world is belong to pakistan . even this killer has pakistan phobia
 
lol, third eye, are you actually believing in this brainwashed crusader terrorist???

what, now will you believe what osama bin laden has to say???

i mean how pathetic indians can get, first they accused this anders guy of being a jehadi islamic terrorist, then they started calling him a kill and murderer but not a terrorist, and now they are proudly posting his sayings and quotations like their bhagwat gita???
 
Pakistani Norwegians are one of the most progressive people out there, perfectly integrated, & even more progressive than Pakistani Americans from what I've heard.
 
i mean how pathetic indians can get, first they accused this anders guy of being a jehadi islamic terrorist, then they started calling him a kill and murderer but not a terrorist, and now they are proudly posting his sayings and quotations like their bhagwat gita???

LOL, it's called a confirmation bias. They will twist any information to suit their pre-conceived bias.
 
None of the reasons mentioned below explains or justifies his acts !

Oslo attacker feared

“It could be similar to the division of India after World War II, with the creation of one or several Islamic ‘Pakistan’ enclaves,” he says.
[/B]

Published in The Express Tribune, July 25th, 2011.

Since when do Christian terrorists start speaking the language of hindutva terrorists. Looks like there is no difference between Christian terrorists and hindoo terrorists both are different side of the same coin.

Surely this terrorist is a history illiterate

Does this terrorist even know Bharat and Pakistan, Burma, Aden, Trucial states, Somalia were part of the colony called British India? Then why Pakistani independence is called a “creation”, Why not call a Bharati independence a “creation” also or more precisely a ‘blunder”.
You don’t become a mother country just because you steal the ancient name of neighbouring country or just because you are 4 times the size of other independent countries. India means country of Indus, Is bharat a country of Indus, India should change its name to Ghanghia or Bhanghia. Ghanghia means country of ganges, Bhanghia means country of bhartis.

Does this terrorist even know the illegitimate state of Bharat was ruled by Muslims for thousands of years, British replaced the Muslim elite with hindoos

Does this terrorist even know Bharat has always been divided into several independent states, which have seldom been long united either by federal co-operation or by conquest.

Does this terrorist even know the artificial entity of Bharat justifies its existence by stealing history and ancient names from neighbouring countries. Why do these bhartis don’t feel proud of saying their ancient name of Bharat, instead of india which originated from Pakistan and was exclusively used for the region surrounding river Indus for centuries.

Does this terrorist even know British saw themselves as the liberators of Hindus from Muslim rule. Hindoos who were always subordinate to the Muslims even though they outnumbered muslims, entered into the British service gained confidence and then all of a sudden the slaves of muslims for thousand years started dreaming about ruling whole of South Asia

It is fairer to say, creation of hindoo entity from Muslim ruled land. Muslims are a ruling race not a slave race like hi.....
When was Baluchistan a part of India even mughals couldn’t rule it more than few decades and that too some part of it.
When was FATA a part of India.
When was Gilgit Baltistan a part of India
 
now if some sh** happens in Norway, and a norwegian does this, it still all comes back to pakistan and a proposed hypothesis of 2083, why not 2080???
 
I personally dont think that radical Muslims will succeed in their plan of converting all other faiths to their own.

There are enough radical Christians and Jews (ignoring the peace-loving Hindus for the time being) to take them head-on.

And if it does become a clash of religions, there's no way Christianity can go down surely.
 
Since when do Christian terrorists start speaking the language of hindutva terrorists. Looks like there is no difference between Christian terrorists and hindoo terrorists both are different side of the same coin.

dear you missed the jews, whether they are sikhs, christians, jews, hindus, all ar after the same goal

i think there are some quotations from quran which says all kaffirs are the same and they dislike muslims, seems to me to be practical through PDF experiences
 
Yep, Europe should play fair by utilizing attack drones in Britain like in the Middle East. ^^ Shooting missiles and dropping bombs onto buildings should be a standard anywhere in the Western world. XD
 
What ever he did by killing is wrong, but
To my view, what the man believed was right, people who follow Islam have little or no tolerance to other religion, expect a few cases where the Muslim society has adoped to change the rules to the chaning times and accomodate themselves into the mordern world.
Was there not a incident that a prominent Pakistani Criket Player had to turn to Islam and change is name to secure his spot in the team. When a Hindu boy changes faith to Chirstianity there is a little displeasure in the family but ultimately the boy is alowed his will. why is this tolerance not there in Islam.
The problem that i see is that most of the people who believe in Islam see it alone can save humanity, but they do not ask the question at what cost? they have to accept that all faith teaches the same in diffent ways and with different examples, if any of you still argue that this is what God told you to follow and make others follow then you will be the untimate victim. This can be seen in reality with the case of Islam.
 
lol, third eye, are you actually believing in this brainwashed crusader terrorist???

what, now will you believe what osama bin laden has to say???

i mean how pathetic indians can get, first they accused this anders guy of being a jehadi islamic terrorist, then they started calling him a kill and murderer but not a terrorist, and now they are proudly posting his sayings and quotations like their bhagwat gita???

Why attack the messenger uh? counter the arguments quoted in the article, personal attack is pathetic way of expressing your anger.
 

Back
Top Bottom