Osama killing: Obama accused of crimes against humanity

[Respect4Respect01]

""Daniel Fiol has lodged a written complaint at the International Criminal Court accusing the US president of breaching the Geneva Convention for ordering the assassination of Osama bin Laden



In his written complaint, the Spanish lawyer said bin Laden should have been, arrested, tried and convicted according to the law. The killing of bin Laden was even worse as it took place in foreign territory, Pakistan, without the permission of that government, he said.""

Dunya TV Print: Osama killing: Obama accused of crimes against humanity

 

[Awesome]

I second that.

 

[Dalai Lama]

Thing is, no one will give a sh*t... the World doesn't pity terrorists.

 

[Respect4Respect01]

Thing is, no one will give a sh*t... the World doesn't pity terrorists.

agreed but there are some laws that you have to follow, Obama got Nobel Peace Prize and he acted like a criminal.

 

[Jade]

The only thing that US violated was Pakistan’s sovereignty, for this I would put blame on the Pakistan’s government than on the US.

As far as Osama is concerned, the US did the correct thing. This should be a lesson to all the terrorist that no place on earth is safe for them to hide. Terrorism is the most henious crime of all

 

[Respect4Respect01]

The only thing that US violated was Pakistan’s sovereignty, for this I would put blame on the Pakistan’s government than on the US.

As far as Osama is concerned, the US did the correct thing. This should be a lesson to all the terrorist that no place on earth is safe for them to hide. Terrorism is the most henious crime of all

agreed that terrorists should be killed, but you have to punish them according to law, and you cant call yourself champions of democracy and human rights if you are violating them yourself.

 

[Major Ram]

Well, OBL was wanted Dear Or Alive.... This spanish man doesnt know what is the meaning of Dead Or Alive...So it doesnt make any difference what this Spanish man has to say....

 

[Dalai Lama]

agreed but there are some laws that you have to follow, Obama got Nobel Peace Prize and he acted like a criminal.

Yes but most people won't care simply because to them Osama was bad enough that it doesn't matter whether he was treated fairly or not. All that matters is that he is now dead.

 

[Major Ram]

agreed that terrorists should be killed, but you have to punish them according to law, and you cant call yourself champions of democracy and human rights if you are violating them yourself.

Right, but the US law has issued the Dead Or Alive statement. So according to the law, even if he is killed during the efforts of arresting him, is allowed.

 

[Respect4Respect01]

Right, but the US law has issued the Dead Or Alive statement. So according to the law, even if he is killed during the efforts of arresting him, is allowed.

yes you are right, but the lawyer accused obama for ordering the assassination of osama.

 

[Jade]

agreed that terrorists should be killed, but you have to punish them according to law, and you cant call yourself champions of democracy and human rights if you are violating them yourself.

But how can you present evidence against a terrorist. Terrorism is not one person…it is an ideology and planning and execution can span across geographies and could involve hundreds of people.

Law can only pronounce somebody guilty when you have physical evidence

It would have been almost impossible for US to present evidence that suggest that Osama was involved in 9/11

Forget democracy and human rights. Terrorism is concerned with the survivability of the human race itself

 

[ashokdeiva]

agreed that terrorists should be killed, but you have to punish them according to law, and you cant call yourself champions of democracy and human rights if you are violating them yourself.

what you say is agreeable for a normal human being like us, but as a leader he faces a much bigger threat, if Osama was captured alive and some terror outfit takes hostage of 100 civilians in a place demanding Osama's release, what will a leader do? US has a policy of not negociating with terrorist and if not negociated the 100 life blood will be on Obama's hand. any way as per international law Osama would have been killed by a electric chair or a leathel injection but he had a quick death. so every one related to him spritually with his tought should feel happy about his dismisal, and the way he was dismissed by a couple of bullets to his head with out torturing him to death

 

[Respect4Respect01]

But how can you present evidence against a terrorist. Terrorism is not one person…it is an ideology and planning and execution can span across geographies and could involve hundreds of people.

Law can only pronounce somebody guilty when you have physical evidence

It would have been almost impossible for US to present evidence that suggest that Osama was involved in 9/11

lol so its better to kill a person because you can not provide any proof.

 

[Oldman1]

yes you are right, but the lawyer accused obama for ordering the assassination of osama.

Since Osama wanted to assassinate Obama, Obama decided to assassinate Osama first. So in reality Osama should be charged with attempting to assassinate Obama.

 

[Respect4Respect01]

what you say is agreeable for a normal human being like us, but as a leader he faces a much bigger threat, if Osama was captured alive and some terror outfit takes hostage of 100 civilians in a place demanding Osama's release, what will a leader do? US has a policy of not negociating with terrorist and if not negociated the 100 life blood will be on Obama's hand. any way as per international law Osama would have been killed by a electric chair or a leathel injection but he had a quick death. so every one related to him spritually with his tought should feel happy about his dismisal, and the way he was dismissed by a couple of bullets to his head with out torturing him to death

yes that is a reasonable answer dude.