What's new

Gazwa e Hind !!!

There have been so many threads on PDF trying to prove that Pakistan is the real India and the ancestors of Pakistanis were the real Hindus. I must say, I’m convinced that Pakistan is the real Hind. Those people on the other side are Gangus.

The Hadith says Ghazwa e Hind, not Ghazwa e Ganga.

Any Ghaza e Hind could be to liberate this land from the mushriqeen of the British Indian Army.
 
At the time of the ostensible prophecy, Hind was cognate with Sindh - the land of the Sindhu ( Indus ) river. So, Ghazwa e Hind means the conquest of the Indus plains, which are all in Pakistan. Maybe it already happened in 1947 when Jinnah from Bombay and Liaquat Ali Khan from UP along with Altaf Hussain's ancestors took over Sindh and the rest of Pakistan.
Lol hind means a country which is East of Indus river means currently India
 
This Gazwa-e-Hind idea is stupid.

Either it already happened with Muhammad bin Qasim, or people are just dreaming.

LOL, let the Hindus have their land. They only form the majority in India and Nepal. lol.

What makes you think Hindus want to convert to another religion overnight?
This is the outcome of brainwashing by Pakistani estableshment who need Islamjc legitimacy. Islam ran out of steam long time ago.
Now Muslims will be lucky if they even survive the modern age. Thoes pagan worshipper homosexual Afghans are the least of all to conduct a ghazwa.
 
Contrary to what we see in the situation in Pakistan today, in my opinion, Pakistan will initiate the utter destruction of Israel, Iran will execute it, and India will be sent to punish Pakistan for her sin, and meanwhile mujahideens after freeing Palestine will turn to India.
Those days will be Merciless days both for Muslims and non-muslims.
 
Last edited:
And defeating a stranded army short of supplies and ammo is no professionalism either.
Stranded in a foreign and alien land?

More populous part of Paksiatn didn’t have any forces deployed for it‘s security and safety and was considered some far away alien land.

That sums up the attitude of West Paksiatnis towards their own brothers and sisters.
 
The poster is a comical fassadi. He is likely to use the thread and blame the opposing argument for being intolerant extremist behaviour threatening local culture and customs.

These people don't breath air. They breath in the fassadic pollution.
 
Stranded in a foreign and alien land?

More populous part of Paksiatn didn’t have any forces deployed for it‘s security and safety and was considered some far away alien land.

That sums up the attitude of West Paksiatnis towards their own brothers and sisters.
Look at the map and area of Bangladesh Vs Pakistan. West Pakistan had a far bigger army requirement than east Pakistan. It's not the population but the total border area in Kms that defines the requirement.
Educate yourself.
 
Educate yourself.
Did you?
Pakistan border length is 7307 kms and out of that 2670 kms is shared with India, rest is with Afghanistan, Iran and China. How many of these are hostile to your nation? A hostility that warrants deployment of regular army? Before you say something just think which borders are safeguarded by PA? Only one and we all know which one.

East Paksiatn had 4096 kms of border with a hostile India. Should I tell the fraction of your armed forces deployed to defend that border? I wouldn’t even mention the quality of equipment.

Please stop buying and selling lame excuses. It was all about West thinking that they had birthright to rule and deploy all resources for themselves. East Paksiatn was never considered a portion that deserved to be treated equally.
It is all documented out there for rational minded people to read and accept.
 
Last edited:
Yes. If you read Shah Naimatullah Wali’s prophecies, they say Pakistan will be occupied up to the River Indus and battles will take place at Attock.

Was he a prophet or his words equal to The Revelation ?

Why The Lord Almighty would want a massacre of around 2 billion+ people ? Or this "prophecy" was just an ajmi imperial pipe dream directly derived from the earlier Arab imperialism ?
 
Well there is a certain ethnic group in Pakistan who love to have their mothers/ daughters /sisters do mujra in Mehfils...

Mujra initially originated from the tehzeebyafta lot of India and adopted by others with a twist of cultural tastes . Umrao jan wasn't based on that certain ethnic group.
 
At the time of the ostensible prophecy, Hind was cognate with Sindh - the land of the Sindhu ( Indus ) river. So, Ghazwa e Hind means the conquest of the Indus plains, which are all in Pakistan. Maybe it already happened in 1947 when Jinnah from Bombay and Liaquat Ali Khan from UP along with Altaf Hussain's ancestors took over Sindh and the rest of Pakistan.
The literature talks about "conquering of India" and bringing "India's kings in chains" and then "finding the Son of Maryam in Ash-Shaam (greater Syria)".

There was no historical event where any "kings of India" were chained up and brought to Syria finding the Son of Maryam.

The word kings is used as a plural. Generally one country has a one king. This implies some future where India is divided back into its natural state of existence, ie many states, where the local version of Hindutva is in power leading to establishment of kinghsips.
 
Only Pakistanis talk about Ghazwa Hind, mythologizing obscure narrations for politics. Some years ago I was in a Masjid run by Arab Salafis who are mostly all about Hadith with undoubting devotion. Someone in a question/answer session asked about Ghazwa Hind, and nobody on the panel or audience had heard about it and these guys teach Hadith courses. They dismissed it as weak or fabricated and moved on to other questions.
 

Back
Top Bottom