No the person is not lower than animals. These animals were created for our ease ... Unfortunately the arrow didn't kill the bird and he had to bear the pain but i am sure this was not the intention of the person ...
U can call it an accident otherwise animals and birds are for ease of human and its not inhuman to use them for food.
I have soft for human but where does using animal for food is inhuman ? An accident where arrow didnt kill the bird means u torture the human with the same arrow ?
R u following hindu religion where animals are sacred then humans ?
U can debate on negative rating may be its too harsh but
@jamahir is saying that penalty of hunting animal is the same and u r defending ... Woww ...
So based on this definition all slaughter house workers in Pakistan should be slaughter ....
Man try to understanding what he is saying ... He is saying man and animals have equal rights which is not the case ...
How can u say that this is for fun and not for food ? Reality check ... The meat u ead is after killing some animal. The only bad thing here is accidentally the arrow didnt kill the bird ... So at max its an accident ...