What's new

'Won't control my men' : Backer of Hathras rape / torture accused threatens violence

Your excuses are hilarious. You're using conjecture and hypothesis to support your apologetic claim.

All things being equal, it is far more probable that this upper caste cabal simply feels it is above the law. Their pathetic excuse for the accused of some "politicization" of the case is an excuse that Pakistanis have heard before.

Whenever non-upper caste Hindus demand their basic right to justice against upper castes, the same victim card is played.


Always with the "politicization" card. We remember 2 BJP lawmakers actually leading protests in favour of the accused filth. Hence, it comes as no surprise that India's sordid history is repeating itself.

By the way, show me how this victim's tongue was injured please. Was it just bite marks or was it bitten off?

LOL. In this case the "dalit" family is FAR RICHER and more politically connected than the "thakur" family.

So "all things being equal" does not apply.

That is the reason the real Dalit party BSP is staying AWAY from this case. They know the real inside story.
 
Did you know this culture started with Aryan invaders who enslaved darker skinned natives of the Indian subcontinent? DNA records show that upper caste DNA specifically from upper caste Aryan males pervaded the lower caste genome. Go figure. India's problems began with the Aryan invasions and the consequent codification and institusionalisation of slavery, permitting upper castes to have their way with lower caste females.

Your historical histrionics should start at the correct reference point.

No one believes your propaganda and lies.

Aryan are natives to the Subcontinent and Persia.

There are inter varna marriages all through our history.

Just read up on how King Shantanu (Thakur in today's world) married Satyavati (SC in today's world)
 
LOL. In this case the "dalit" family is FAR RICHER and more politically connected than the "thakur" family.

So "all things being equal" does not apply.

That is the reason the real Dalit party BSP is staying AWAY from this case. They know the real inside story.
Your opinion and idle conjecture is not even enough to count as circumstantial evidence. It is sheer conjecture and gossip. It is of no substance. Do you understand that?

Now, I've asked you to explain to me the injuries on the victim's tongue. If it is "bitten OFF", then she was raped and grievously assaulted. Now @jamahir has said it was a severe injury. You seem to be of the opinion that it is a self inflicted injury during strangulation. Conveniently, the body was quickly incinerated, despite the family's protests.
 
This is not Hindu culture.

Unfortunately North Indians Hindus have obtain this thing from the Muslim invaders who have a policy/custom of taking opponent's women as sex slaves.

Hindu culture is as follows:

1. Commit crimes
2. Blame Muslims for those crimes.
 
No one believes your propaganda and lies.

Aryan are natives to the Subcontinent and Persia.

There are inter varna marriages all through our history.

Just read up on how King Shantanu (Thakur in today's world) married Satyavati (SC in today's world)
Aryans are natives to Persia and India? Are they natives to Persia or India? Which is it please? You're conflating Persia and India to suit your narrative. Genetically, Indian natives were nothing like Persians. I know that breaks your heart. Did you know the IVC came between Persia and you geographically?

It's laughable that you equate coterminous India and its dark natives with Persia, with the IVC somehow coming in between.

Aryans were certainly related to Persians, but not to the elephant riding natives of coterminous India - until they arrived and enslaved your ancestors with the caste system that still endures to this day, which brings us nicely onto the matter of the sense of historical entitlement upper castes have displayed in this case towards Dalits.

Nothing changes in Hindustan.
 
Your opinion and idle conjecture is not even enough to count as circumstantial evidence. It is sheer conjecture and gossip. It is of no substance. Do you understand that?

Now, I've asked you to explain to me the injuries on the victim's tongue. If it is "bitten OFF", then she was raped and grievously assaulted. Now @jamahir has said it was a severe injury. You seem to be of the opinion that it is a self inflicted injury during strangulation. Conveniently, the body was quickly incinerated, despite the family's protests.

I am still reeling after knowing that I disgust you. :cry:

I can only reply to you after I recover from my extreme disappointment. It might take a few years.
 
Hindu culture is as follows:

1. Commit crimes
2. Blame Muslims for those crimes.

Muslims are responsible for the crimes they committed and Hindus for theirs.

I was only elaborating on the origin and root cause of the crimes.

No one can deny that these crimes started in the subcontinent by the acts of Islamic invaders starting with the below.


Do you know how the daughters of last Hindu ruler Raja Dahir took revenge of their father’s death?
SuperadminSeptember 8, 2019

raja-dahir.png


Share2K
Tweet
WhatsApp
2KSHARES
Sindh is one of the world’s most ancient civilized and organized city of Indus Valley, which has seen many rise and fall. The signs of its ancient glory are still to be found in the relics of Anri, Kot Diji and Mohenjodaro.
The land adjacent to Indus River and the Thar Desert is one of the oldest inhabited regions in the world; that hosted the world’s great pre-classical civilizations.
Sindh has been ruled by many and it had a hardship as a colony of aliens. History has been not found so clear, but the recent history begins with Rai Sahasi and Chuch Dynasties.
The Chuch Dynasty was also called as the Brahmin dynasty. The last ruler was Raja Dahir, the younger son of Chuch was born in 663 AD.
Raja Dahir ascended the throne upon the death of his uncle Chander. Sindh Dynasty was ruled over territories that include the parts of Modern-day Afganistan, Balochistan, Iran, Pakistan and parts of Punjab.
Eight years later, Kannauj’s emperor Ramal had invaded Dahir’s kingdom. With initial losses, Ramal had taken the Aror region and he allied himself with Alafi, the Arab.
Alafi and his warriors, who were exiled from the Umayyad Caliphate, got recruited. They led Dahir’s armies to repel the invading forces and to remain as valued members of his court.
However, Alafi served as a military advisor but, refused to take a higher position in a battle field. As a result, he had later obtained a pardon from the Caliph.
Modern Sri Lanka had been stolen!
The oldest chronicles of the Arab conquest of Sindh – for the expedition by the governor of Basra, Al-Hajjaj ibn Yusuf, against Raja Dahir, was a pirate who had raid off the coast of Debal, resulted in gifts to the Caliph from the king of Serendib (modern Sri Lanka) was stolen and that was the primary reason to be cited in the Chach Nama.
The Chuch Nama reported that, “As soon as he heard the matter of Hajjaj, he wrote a letter to the Raja Dahir about unsuccessful resolution, which was resulted in a launch of military expedition.”
Further, in addition to protect their maritime interests, the reasons attributed to the Umayyad interest in gaining the Makran, Balochistan and Sindh regions led to the participation of armies from Sindh alongside Persians in various battles such as Nahawand, Salasal and Qadisiyyah and the granting of refugee to fleeing rebel chieftains.
There is another untold story!
When Raja Dahir, who had fallen out of favour with Hajjaj taken asylum in Sindh, refused to hand over some Arab exiles. Al-Hajjaj’s sent a powerful army of soldiers commanded by his nephew Muhammad Bin Qasim in order to take revenge.
Under the aegis of Muhammad bin Qasim, Hajjaj’s campaign was launched. In 711 CE, on the orders of Al-Hajjaj, Bin Qasim attacked Debal.
From Debal, Bin-Qasim moved on to Nerum for supplies. The Buddhist governor of the city had acknowledged it as a tributary state of the Caliphate after the first campaign of Hajjaj and capitulated to Bin-Qasim.
Muhammad Bin Qasim defeated Dahir and captured his eastern territories for the Umayyad Caliphate by the support of various tribes. The Jats, Meds, Bhuttos and Buddhist rulers of Nerun, Bajhra, Kaka Kolak and Swistan stood up as an infantry to Bin Qasim’s predominantly cavalry army.
Moving his forces to its eastern banks, Dahir then tried to prevent Qasim from crossing the Indus River. However, Qasim crossed and defeated the forces at Jitor led by Jaisiah, Son of Dahir.
In 712, Qasim fought Dahir at Aror, near modern Nawabshah and killed him. After Dahir was killed in the battle of Aror on the banks of Indus River, his head was cut-off and sent to Hajjaj bin Yousuf!
“We have conquered Sindh after enormous trouble.
Muhammad-bin-Qasim’s masterly strategy betrayed Dahir.
Rejoice, the evil doers are disgraced!
Their wealth has been brought away.
They are now solitary and brittle as eggs and their women, fair and fragrant as musk-deer, are now asleep in our harems!”
A courtier noted in his literature when Dahir’s bleeding head reached the court of Hajjaj.
Raja Dahir’s wife and other women of the household committed Jauhar rather than being captured alive by the invaders. Unfortunately, the invaders captured Dahir’s two daughters, Suray Devi and Premala Devi.
The Chach Nama attributes the death of Qasim to these brave girls who had been taken captive during the invasion. Later, they had been sent as gifts to the Khalifa for his harem in Damascus. But, the sisters tricked the Kaliph and made him to believe that Bin-Qasim had violated them before sending them as gifts. As a result of this subterfuge, Bin Qasim was wrapped and stitched in oxen hides, and returned to Syria, which was resulted in his death en route from suffocation.
The Khalifa is recorded to have been filled with remorse and ordered the sisters buried alive in wall, when he had discovered the deceit of two girls.
And, this is how the Chuch dynasty has ended with the footprints of Raja Dahir and his brave daughters.


 
Meanwhile Media had reported that "the woman's father was not inclined to shift her in AIIMS even though her situation was critical as on 26th Sep."

Why was he not inclined for better medical attention ? She could have been alive now. Why din't the "victims" father not try his best to save her life ?

Maybe her father felt she was being well looked after. Maybe he was being pressured by the police and the state government.

Here is the EVIL Thakur father of the accused sharing his side of the story. Ever wonder why NO Media channel showed it ?


His speaking for his son to be punished if he is guilty is admirable but we have to wait for real investigation.

LOL you are clueless.

Brahmins and Thakurs have rivalry.

This is the reason why Brahmins support Congress and BSP while Thakurs Support BJP.

The leader in the OP seems to be a Thakur and he was part of the RSS ( the original ). As per my estimation the RSS is filled with Brahmins including one of its chiefs, Golwalkar.

Mandal commission was about reservations for other OBCs. Nothing to do with Dalits.

The commission also sought to alleviate the Scheduled Castes which include the Dalits.
 
Hindu culture is as follows:

1. Commit crimes
2. Blame Muslims for those crimes.

True, its more shocking how these Hindus take muslims names before committing a crime.

Like how on the same day as this incident, two Hindu boys took the name of Shahid and Sahil , and then Raped and broke the leg and spine of a Dalit girl in Balrampur. Put her in a rickshaw and sent her home where she died.

Sadly Indian Media did no shows about that news since the rapist Hindus preteded to be muslim, though the victim was a Dalit.


"My daughter had gone to take admission in a college on Tuesday. On her way back, three-four persons abducted her, took her to their room, gave her an injection and raped her. They later sent her back on an e-rickshaw, which dumped her outside our house. They broke her legs and back. She could not stand or talk," the woman said.
 
True, its more shocking how these Hindus take muslims names before committing a crime.

Like how on the same day as this incident, two Hindu boys took the name of Shahid and Sahil , and then Raped and broke the leg and spine of a Dalit girl in Balrampur. Put her in a rickshaw and sent her home where she died.

Sadly Indian Media did no shows about that news since the rapist Hindus preteded to be muslim, though the victim was a Dalit.


"My daughter had gone to take admission in a college on Tuesday. On her way back, three-four persons abducted her, took her to their room, gave her an injection and raped her. They later sent her back on an e-rickshaw, which dumped her outside our house. They broke her legs and back. She could not stand or talk," the woman said.

Exactly. Thanks for clarifying how disgusting your people are.
 
Aryans are natives to Persia and India? Are they natives to Persia or India? Which is it please? You're conflating Persia and India to suit your narrative. Genetically, Indian natives were nothing like Persians. I know that breaks your heart. Did you know the IVC came between Persia and you geographically?

It's laughable that you equate coterminous India and its dark natives with Persia, with the IVC somehow coming in between.

Aryans were certainly related to Persians, but not to the elephant riding natives of coterminous India - until they arrived and enslaved your ancestors with the caste system that still endures to this day, which brings us nicely onto the matter of the sense of historical entitlement upper castes have displayed in this case towards Dalits.

Nothing changes in Hindustan.

LOL Both Persians and Indians are Aryans. It is a well documented history. Indians are followers of Suras while Persians were followers of Asuras.
 
You prove again and again that you are morally bankrupt.

Someone whose society has no morals is preaching about moral bankruptcy. Irony died a thousand deaths.
 
Back
Top Bottom